TSTP Solution File: SYN927+1 by Z3---4.8.9.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Z3---4.8.9.0
% Problem  : SYN927+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 30 00:01:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SYN927+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : z3_tptp -proof -model -t:%d -file:%s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  5 09:25:12 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.34  Z3tptp [4.8.9.0] (c) 2006-20**. Microsoft Corp.
% 0.12/0.34  Usage: tptp [options] [-file:]file
% 0.12/0.34    -h, -?       prints this message.
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2        print SMT-LIB2 benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -m, -model   generate model.
% 0.12/0.34    -p, -proof   generate proof.
% 0.12/0.34    -c, -core    generate unsat core of named formulas.
% 0.12/0.34    -st, -statistics display statistics.
% 0.12/0.34    -t:timeout   set timeout (in second).
% 0.12/0.34    -smt2status  display status in smt2 format instead of SZS.
% 0.12/0.34    -check_status check the status produced by Z3 against annotation in benchmark.
% 0.12/0.34    -<param>:<value> configuration parameter and value.
% 0.12/0.34    -o:<output-file> file to place output in.
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.12/0.38  tff(p_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.38     p: $i > $o)).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(tptp_fun_Y_0_type, type, (
% 0.12/0.38     tptp_fun_Y_0: $i)).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(1,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (^[X: $i] : refl(p(X) <=> p(X))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(bind,[status(th)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(2,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : p(X) <=> ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_intro,[status(thm)],[1])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(3,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (((~p(Y!0)) & ![X: $i] : p(X)) <=> ((~p(Y!0)) & ![X: $i] : p(X))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(4,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))) <=> (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X))))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(5,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![Y: $i] : (![X: $i] : p(X) => p(Y))) <=> (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X))))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(6,axiom,(~![Y: $i] : (![X: $i] : p(X) => p(Y))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p','prove_this')).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(7,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[6, 5])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(8,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[7, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(9,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[8, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(10,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[9, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(11,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[10, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(12,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[11, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(13,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~![Y: $i] : (p(Y) | (~![X: $i] : p(X)))),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[12, 4])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(14,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~p(Y!0)) & ![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[13, 3])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(15,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[14])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(16,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (![X: $i] : p(X)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(modus_ponens,[status(thm)],[15, 2])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(17,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      (~p(Y!0)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(and_elim,[status(thm)],[14])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(18,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ((~![X: $i] : p(X)) | p(Y!0)),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(quant_inst,[status(thm)],[])).
% 0.12/0.38  tff(19,plain,
% 0.12/0.38      ($false),
% 0.12/0.38      inference(unit_resolution,[status(thm)],[18, 17, 16])).
% 0.12/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------