TSTP Solution File: SYN926+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:46:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  18   ~;   8   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  10   !;  11   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f16,f18,f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f12,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    q(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( q(sK0)
    & p(sK0)
    & ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
      | ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f4,f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
   => ( q(sK0)
      & p(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
    & ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
      | ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) )
     => ( ? [X1] : p(X1)
        & ? [X2] : q(X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) )
     => ( ? [X0] : p(X0)
        & ? [X0] : q(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
   => ( ? [X0] : p(X0)
      & ? [X0] : q(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : ~ q(X2)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f15,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ p(X1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f7,f14,f11]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ p(X1)
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.09  % Problem    : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.08/0.10  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 22:45:51 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.46  % (2536)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/467Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (2519)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (2528)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/75Mi)
% 0.15/0.46  % (2536)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.47  % (2528)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.47  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.47  
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Time elapsed: 0.066 s
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (2536)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.47  % (2512)Success in time 0.157 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------