TSTP Solution File: SYN926+1 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  20   ~;   9   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (  12   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f17,f19,f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( q(sK0)
    & p(sK0)
    & ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
      | ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f5,f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
   => ( q(sK0)
      & p(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
    & ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
      | ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
    & ( ! [X2] : ~ p(X2)
      | ! [X1] : ~ q(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) )
     => ( ? [X1] : q(X1)
        & ? [X2] : p(X2) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X0] :
          ( q(X0)
          & p(X0) )
     => ( ? [X0] : q(X0)
        & ? [X0] : p(X0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( q(X0)
        & p(X0) )
   => ( ? [X0] : q(X0)
      & ? [X0] : p(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ p(X1)
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ p(X1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f18]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f16,f10]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    q(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : ~ q(X2)
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ! [X2] : ~ q(X2) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f8,f15,f12]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X2,X1] :
      ( ~ q(X2)
      | ~ p(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 22:40:49 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  % (14099)lrs+10_1:1_ep=R:lcm=predicate:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal:ss=included:i=12:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (14115)lrs+1011_1:1_fd=preordered:fsd=on:sos=on:thsq=on:thsqc=64:thsqd=32:uwa=ground:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (14107)ott+1010_1:1_sd=2:sos=on:sp=occurrence:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (14092)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.50  % (14099)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.51  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Time elapsed: 0.102 s
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (14099)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  % (14088)Success in time 0.155 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------