%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Goeland---1.0.0
% Problem  : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 29 22:24:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.35s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : SYN926+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : goeland -dmt -presko -proof %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  5 09:34:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.35  [DMT] DMT loaded with preskolemization
% 0.19/0.35  [EQ] equality loaded.
% 0.19/0.35  [0.000034s][1][MAIN] Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35  Start search
% 0.19/0.35  nb_step : 1 - limit : 3
% 0.19/0.35  Launch Gotab with destructive = true
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35  [0] ALPHA_NOT_IMPLY : ~(? [X1_1] :  ((p(X1_1) & q(X1_1))) => (? [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)) & ? [X3_3] :  (q(X3_3))))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [1] ? [X1_1] :  ((p(X1_1) & q(X1_1))), ~(? [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)) & ? [X3_3] :  (q(X3_3)))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [1] DELTA_EXISTS : ? [X1_1] :  ((p(X1_1) & q(X1_1)))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [2] (p(skolem_X11) & q(skolem_X11))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [2] ALPHA_AND : (p(skolem_X11) & q(skolem_X11))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [3] p(skolem_X11), q(skolem_X11)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [3] BETA_NOT_AND : ~(? [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2)) & ? [X3_3] :  (q(X3_3)))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [4] ~? [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [5] ~? [X3_3] :  (q(X3_3))
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [4] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X2_2] :  (p(X2_2))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [6] ~p(X2_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [6] CLOSURE : ~p(X2_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [5] GAMMA_NOT_EXISTS : ~? [X3_3] :  (q(X3_3))
% 0.19/0.35  	-> [7] ~q(X3_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  [7] CLOSURE : ~q(X3_0_0)
% 0.19/0.35  
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.35  [0.004776s][1][Res] 11 goroutines created
% 0.19/0.35  ==== Result ====
% 0.19/0.35  [0.004806s][1][Res] VALID
% 0.19/0.35  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------