TSTP Solution File: SYN918+1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:48:03 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:11:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % File : SYN918+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.20/0.60 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.60 % Problem : From Smullyan
% 0.20/0.60 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.60 % English :
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Refs : [Smu68] Smullyan (1968), First-Order Logic
% 0.20/0.60 % [Shu04] Shults (2004), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.60 % Source : [Shu04]
% 0.20/0.60 % Names :
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Status : Theorem
% 0.20/0.60 % Rating : 0.00 v8.1.0, 0.07 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.04 v6.0.0, 0.25 v5.5.0, 0.08 v5.4.0, 0.09 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.07 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.11 v4.0.0, 0.10 v3.7.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.12 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0
% 0.20/0.60 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 1 ( 0 unt; 0 def)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula atoms : 15 ( 15 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of connectives : 16 ( 2 ~; 1 |; 6 &)
% 0.20/0.60 % ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 8 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.20/0.60 % Number of variables : 6 ( 4 !; 2 ?)
% 0.20/0.60 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 fof(prove_this,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.60 ( ( ! [X] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( ( ( f(X)
% 0.20/0.60 & g(X) )
% 0.20/0.60 => h(X) )
% 0.20/0.60 => ? [Y] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( f(Y)
% 0.20/0.60 & ~ g(Y) ) )
% 0.20/0.60 & ( ! [W] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( f(W)
% 0.20/0.60 => g(W) )
% 0.20/0.60 | ! [Z] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( f(Z)
% 0.20/0.60 => h(Z) ) ) )
% 0.20/0.60 => ( ! [R] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( ( f(R)
% 0.20/0.60 & h(R) )
% 0.20/0.60 => g(R) )
% 0.20/0.60 => ? [V] :
% 0.20/0.60 ( f(V)
% 0.20/0.60 & g(V)
% 0.20/0.60 & ~ h(V) ) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.60 %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.60 %VarNum:14(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.20/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.20/0.60 %SharedTerms:3
% 0.20/0.60 %goalClause: 1 3 4 6 7 8 9
% 0.20/0.60 [1]P1(x11)+P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.60 [3]P1(x31)+~P2(a1)
% 0.20/0.60 [4]P2(x41)+~P2(a1)
% 0.20/0.60 [6]~P3(x61)+~P2(a1)
% 0.20/0.60 [7]~P1(x71)+~P3(x71)+P2(x71)
% 0.20/0.60 [8]~P1(x81)+~P2(x81)+P3(x81)
% 0.20/0.60 [9]~P1(x92)+~P1(x91)+P2(x91)+P3(x92)
% 0.20/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.60
% 0.20/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(10,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P3(a1)+P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,7])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P2(x111)+P3(x111)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,8])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (P3(x121)+~P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,11])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(13,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P2(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,12])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(14,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 (~P3(a1)),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,10])).
% 0.20/0.60 cnf(16,plain,
% 0.20/0.60 ($false),
% 0.20/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[13,14,9,1]),
% 0.20/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------