TSTP Solution File: SYN810-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN810-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.01s 300.19s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : SYN810-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 18:11:08 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.29/1.48  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 1.29/1.48  The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 1.29/1.48  Mon Jul 11 18:11:08 2022
% 1.29/1.48  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5193.
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.29/1.48  set(auto).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 1.29/1.48  clear(print_given).
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  list(usable).
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 1.29/1.48  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 1.29/1.48  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.29/1.48     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  ------------> process usable:
% 1.29/1.48  64 back subsumes 63.
% 1.29/1.48  161 back subsumes 91.
% 1.29/1.48  482 back subsumes 471.
% 1.29/1.48  483 back subsumes 478.
% 1.29/1.48  502 back subsumes 501.
% 1.29/1.48  535 back subsumes 531.
% 1.29/1.48  550 back subsumes 548.
% 1.29/1.48  588 back subsumes 587.
% 1.29/1.48  600 back subsumes 591.
% 1.29/1.48  603 back subsumes 601.
% 1.29/1.48  629 back subsumes 628.
% 1.29/1.48  641 back subsumes 632.
% 1.29/1.48  644 back subsumes 642.
% 1.29/1.48  669 back subsumes 668.
% 1.29/1.48  681 back subsumes 672.
% 1.29/1.48  684 back subsumes 682.
% 1.29/1.48  715 back subsumes 708.
% 1.29/1.48  744 back subsumes 730.
% 1.29/1.48  758 back subsumes 747.
% 1.29/1.48  759 back subsumes 754.
% 1.29/1.48  784 back subsumes 770.
% 1.29/1.48  789 back subsumes 779.
% 1.29/1.48  798 back subsumes 787.
% 1.29/1.48  799 back subsumes 794.
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  ------------> process sos:
% 1.29/1.48  
% 1.29/1.48  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.35/1.54  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.35/1.54  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.35/1.54  number of clauses in intial UL: 822
% 1.35/1.54  number of clauses initially in problem: 824
% 1.35/1.54  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 1.35/1.54  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 1.35/1.54  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 1.35/1.54  absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 1.35/1.54     distinct predicate count: 9
% 1.35/1.54     distinct function count: 2
% 1.35/1.54     distinct constant count: 0
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.54  
% 1.35/1.54  =========== start of search ===========
% 21.82/22.05  
% 21.82/22.05  
% 21.82/22.05  Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 21.82/22.05  
% 21.82/22.05  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 21.82/22.05  
% 21.82/22.05  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 21.82/22.05  
% 21.82/22.05  Resetting weight limit to 59 after 60 givens.
% 21.82/22.05  
% 29.90/30.07  
% 29.90/30.07  
% 29.90/30.07  Changing weight limit from 59 to 57.
% 29.90/30.07  
% 29.90/30.07  Resetting weight limit to 57 after 65 givens.
% 29.90/30.07  
% 40.18/40.39  
% 40.18/40.39  
% 40.18/40.39  Changing weight limit from 57 to 55.
% 40.18/40.39  
% 40.18/40.39  Resetting weight limit to 55 after 70 givens.
% 40.18/40.39  
% 55.12/55.32  
% 55.12/55.32  
% 55.12/55.32  Changing weight limit from 55 to 52.
% 55.12/55.32  
% 55.12/55.32  Resetting weight limit to 52 after 75 givens.
% 55.12/55.32  
% 66.51/66.69  
% 66.51/66.69  
% 66.51/66.69  Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 66.51/66.69  
% 66.51/66.69  Resetting weight limit to 51 after 80 givens.
% 66.51/66.69  
% 74.70/74.92  
% 74.70/74.92  
% 74.70/74.92  Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 74.70/74.92  
% 74.70/74.92  Resetting weight limit to 50 after 85 givens.
% 74.70/74.92  
% 96.36/96.56  
% 96.36/96.56  
% 96.36/96.56  Changing weight limit from 50 to 48.
% 96.36/96.56  
% 96.36/96.56  Resetting weight limit to 48 after 95 givens.
% 96.36/96.56  
% 132.65/132.83  
% 132.65/132.83  
% 132.65/132.83  Changing weight limit from 48 to 47.
% 132.65/132.83  
% 132.65/132.83  Resetting weight limit to 47 after 110 givens.
% 132.65/132.83  
% 149.30/149.48  
% 149.30/149.48  
% 149.30/149.48  Changing weight limit from 47 to 46.
% 149.30/149.48  
% 149.30/149.48  Resetting weight limit to 46 after 115 givens.
% 149.30/149.48  
% 202.79/202.99  
% 202.79/202.99  
% 202.79/202.99  Changing weight limit from 46 to 45.
% 202.79/202.99  
% 202.79/202.99  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 125 givens.
% 202.79/202.99  
% 269.58/269.81  
% 269.58/269.81  
% 269.58/269.81  Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 269.58/269.81  
% 269.58/269.81  Resetting weight limit to 44 after 135 givens.
% 269.58/269.81  
% 300.01/300.19  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------