TSTP Solution File: SYN810-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN810-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:59:54 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16135/SYN/SYN810-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 20] [nf = 10] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 530] [nf = 104] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4920] [nf = 358] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48560] [nf = 880] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 219520] [nf = 1582] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 390480] [nf = 2284] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 561440] [nf = 2986] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 732400] [nf = 3688] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 903360] [nf = 4390] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1074320] [nf = 5092] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1245280] [nf = 5794] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1416240] [nf = 6496] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1587200] [nf = 7198] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1758160] [nf = 7900] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1929120] [nf = 8602] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2100080] [nf = 9304] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2271040] [nf = 10006] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2442000] [nf = 10708] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2612960] [nf = 11410] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2783920] [nf = 12112] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2954880] [nf = 12814] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 3125840] [nf = 13516] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 3296800] [nf = 14218] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3467760] [nf = 14920] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3638720] [nf = 15622] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809680] [nf = 16324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809680] [nf = 16324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809680] [nf = 16324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809680] [nf = 16324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809700] [nf = 16324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3809848] [nf = 16490] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 3811398] [nf = 17348] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 3823838] [nf = 19906] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 3942338] [nf = 24124] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 4413518] [nf = 29150] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proo
% f at depth = 10 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 4890210] [nf = 44912] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 5428394] [nf = 157546] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 6463114] [nf = 1192068] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 39 secs [nr = 10730770] [nf = 5605262] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 89 secs [nr = 21489934] [nf = 10027456] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 140 secs [nr = 32290738] [nf = 14519778] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 191 secs [nr = 43305058] [nf = 19362500] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 249 secs [nr = 55555882] [nf = 26746822] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 101836950
% resolvents: 67149790 factors: 34687160
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 1909448 [5] = 6435439 [6] = 17992425 [7] = 30826984 [8] = 34706946 [9] = 9965708
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 24659000
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 101836950
% Number of unification failures: 178267743
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 187338895
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3172274
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 20
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 280104693
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 339456
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------