TSTP Solution File: SYN808-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN808-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:57:55 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8878/SYN/SYN808-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 346] [nf = 82] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8468] [nf = 432] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 53518] [nf = 998] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 195600] [nf = 1656] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 337682] [nf = 2314] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 479764] [nf = 2972] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 621846] [nf = 3630] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 763928] [nf = 4288] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 906010] [nf = 4946] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1048092] [nf = 5604] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1190174] [nf = 6262] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1332256] [nf = 6920] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1474338] [nf = 7578] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1616420] [nf = 8236] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1758502] [nf = 8894] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1900584] [nf = 9552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2042666] [nf = 10210] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2184748] [nf = 10868] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2326830] [nf = 11526] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2468912] [nf = 12184] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2610994] [nf = 12842] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2753076] [nf = 13500] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2895158] [nf = 14158] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3037240] [nf = 14816] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179322] [nf = 15474] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179322] [nf = 15474] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179322] [nf = 15474] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179322] [nf = 15474] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179346] [nf = 15474] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3179484] [nf = 15590] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3180616] [nf = 16840] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3202686] [nf = 19654] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3319276] [nf = 23388] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 3691756] [nf = 27906] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 .
% ..
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4069256] [nf = 42824] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 4539710] [nf = 315908] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 5967436] [nf = 1658720] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 40 secs [nr = 10622526] [nf = 5105252] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 84 secs [nr = 20331236] [nf = 8557544] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 30051586] [nf = 12026036] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 174 secs [nr = 40122180] [nf = 16385696] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 226 secs [nr = 51177590] [nf = 21662276] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 283 secs [nr = 63096568] [nf = 26938856] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 96060208
% resolvents: 67254936 factors: 28805272
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 2478922 [5] = 3800543 [6] = 18973835 [7] = 34042158 [8] = 28792019 [9] = 7972731
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 11797170
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 96060208
% Number of unification failures: 183518755
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 138221716
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 4045846
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 20
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 279578963
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 320201
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------