TSTP Solution File: SYN802-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN802-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:57:06 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP669/SYN/SYN802-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 646] [nf = 100] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8984] [nf = 462] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 49346] [nf = 1034] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 281052] [nf = 1762] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 512758] [nf = 2490] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 744464] [nf = 3218] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 976170] [nf = 3946] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1207876] [nf = 4674] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 1439582] [nf = 5402] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 1671288] [nf = 6130] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 1902994] [nf = 6858] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 2134700] [nf = 7586] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 2366406] [nf = 8314] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2598112] [nf = 9042] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2829818] [nf = 9770] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 3061524] [nf = 10498] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 3293230] [nf = 11226] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 3524936] [nf = 11954] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3756642] [nf = 12682] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3988348] [nf = 13410] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 4220054] [nf = 14138] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 4451760] [nf = 14866] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 4683466] [nf = 15594] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 13 secs [nr = 4915172] [nf = 16322] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146878] [nf = 17050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146878] [nf = 17050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146878] [nf = 17050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146878] [nf = 17050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146886] [nf = 17050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5146992] [nf = 17262] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5148776] [nf = 18650] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5170492] [nf = 21532] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5277000] [nf = 25824] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 16 secs [nr = 5873230] [nf = 30472] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proo
% f at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 17 secs [nr = 6473620] [nf = 49346] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 19 secs [nr = 7174398] [nf = 235032] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 25 secs [nr = 8652482] [nf = 1201462] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 46 secs [nr = 13401666] [nf = 5833412] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 134 secs [nr = 36022138] [nf = 10468002] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 221 secs [nr = 58681562] [nf = 15214552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 99692383
% 	resolvents: 79330194	factors: 20362189
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2		
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 3636951	[5] = 12081632	[6] = 29834591	[7] = 29396259	[8] = 20369210	[9] = 4373740	
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] ssRr_2		(+)2	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)2	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 23213946
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 99692383
% Number of unification failures: 177654740
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 59036209
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 49234
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 277347123
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 332308
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------