TSTP Solution File: SYN789-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN789-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:51:25 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15761/SYN/SYN789-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 246] [nf = 38] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 7820] [nf = 326] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 60226] [nf = 872] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 227148] [nf = 1540] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 394070] [nf = 2208] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 560992] [nf = 2876] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 727914] [nf = 3544] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 894836] [nf = 4212] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1061758] [nf = 4880] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 1228680] [nf = 5548] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 1395602] [nf = 6216] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 4 secs [nr = 1562524] [nf = 6884] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 1729446] [nf = 7552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 5 secs [nr = 1896368] [nf = 8220] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 2063290] [nf = 8888] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 6 secs [nr = 2230212] [nf = 9556] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2397134] [nf = 10224] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2564056] [nf = 10892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 7 secs [nr = 2730978] [nf = 11560] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 2897900] [nf = 12228] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 3064822] [nf = 12896] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 3231744] [nf = 13564] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 3398666] [nf = 14232] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 9 secs [nr = 3565588] [nf = 14900] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732510] [nf = 15568] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732510] [nf = 15568] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732510] [nf = 15568] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732510] [nf = 15568] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732518] [nf = 15576] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3732572] [nf = 15670] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3733228] [nf = 16866] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3752666] [nf = 19842] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 10 secs [nr = 3887174] [nf = 24012] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 4328702] [nf = 28304] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 .
% ..
% 	t = 12 secs [nr = 4771254] [nf = 38280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 14 secs [nr = 5267562] [nf = 186938] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 18 secs [nr = 6490866] [nf = 1028052] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 35 secs [nr = 10702926] [nf = 4312702] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 83 secs [nr = 23296650] [nf = 7597352] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 130 secs [nr = 35890374] [nf = 10882002] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 177 secs [nr = 48560610] [nf = 14519212] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 228 secs [nr = 61975086] [nf = 18156422] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 296 secs [nr = 78148314] [nf = 32800128] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 113482581
% 	resolvents: 80082838	factors: 33399743
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2		
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 2662392	[5] = 7443629	[6] = 27881718	[7] = 34519120	[8] = 33395938	[9] = 7579784	
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] ssRr_2		(+)2	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)2	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 22039602
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 113482581
% Number of unification failures: 199275707
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 75438427
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2184940
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 20
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 312758288
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 378275
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------