TSTP Solution File: SYN781-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN781-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:48:23 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 32.12s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20571/SYN/SYN781-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 128] [nf = 28] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3960] [nf = 206] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38494] [nf = 570] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 227920] [nf = 1088] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 417346] [nf = 1606] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 606772] [nf = 2124] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 796198] [nf = 2642] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 985624] [nf = 3160] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1175050] [nf = 3678] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1364476] [nf = 4196] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1553902] [nf = 4714] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1743328] [nf = 5232] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1932754] [nf = 5750] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2122180] [nf = 6268] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2311606] [nf = 6786] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2501032] [nf = 7304] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2690458] [nf = 7822] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2879884] [nf = 8340] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3069310] [nf = 8858] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3258736] [nf = 9376] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3448162] [nf = 9894] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3637588] [nf = 10412] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3827014] [nf = 10930] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 4016440] [nf = 11448] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205866] [nf = 11966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205866] [nf = 11966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205866] [nf = 11966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205866] [nf = 11966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205866] [nf = 11966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4205890] [nf = 12030] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4206338] [nf = 12682] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4217166] [nf = 14532] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4310436] [nf = 17760] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4807772] [nf = 21142] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 12 secs
% [nr = 5305108] [nf = 24524] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 5802444] [nf = 27906] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 6299780] [nf = 31288] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 6797116] [nf = 34670] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 7294452] [nf = 38052] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 17 secs [nr = 7791788] [nf = 41434] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 8289124] [nf = 44816] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 8786460] [nf = 48198] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 9283796] [nf = 51580] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 21 secs [nr = 9781132] [nf = 54962] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 22 secs [nr = 10278468] [nf = 58344] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 10775804] [nf = 61726] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 11273140] [nf = 65108] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 11770476] [nf = 68490] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 26 secs [nr = 12267812] [nf = 71872] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 12765148] [nf = 75254] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 28 secs [nr = 13262484] [nf = 78636] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 29 secs [nr = 13759820] [nf = 82018] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 30 secs [nr = 14257156] [nf = 85400] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 14754492] [nf = 88782] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 15251828] [nf = 92164] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 15343992
% resolvents: 15251828 factors: 92164
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 5043936 [5] = 6405988 [6] = 3018572 [7] = 748640 [8] = 116060 [9] = 10796
% Average size of a generated clause: 5.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 3464
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 15343992
% Number of unification failures: 19450972
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 5880
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 34794964
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 479500
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 32 secs
% CPU time: 32.12 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------