TSTP Solution File: SYN780-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN780-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 295.88s 296.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN780-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 16:04:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.55/0.76 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.55/0.76 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.55/0.76 Mon Jul 11 16:04:34 2022
% 0.55/0.76 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4586.
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.55/0.76 set(auto).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.55/0.76 clear(print_given).
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 list(usable).
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.55/0.76 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.55/0.76 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.55/0.76 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 ------------> process usable:
% 0.55/0.76 109 back subsumes 88.
% 0.55/0.76 264 back subsumes 263.
% 0.55/0.76 287 back subsumes 281.
% 0.55/0.76 304 back subsumes 294.
% 0.55/0.76 394 back subsumes 378.
% 0.55/0.76 399 back subsumes 388.
% 0.55/0.76 408 back subsumes 397.
% 0.55/0.76 409 back subsumes 404.
% 0.55/0.76 416 back subsumes 415.
% 0.55/0.76 428 back subsumes 419.
% 0.55/0.76 431 back subsumes 429.
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 ------------> process sos:
% 0.55/0.76
% 0.55/0.76 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.59/0.81 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.59/0.81 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.59/0.81 number of clauses in intial UL: 469
% 0.59/0.81 number of clauses initially in problem: 471
% 0.59/0.81 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.59/0.81 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.59/0.81 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.59/0.81 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.59/0.81 distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.59/0.81 distinct function count: 2
% 0.59/0.81 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.59/0.81
% 0.59/0.81 =========== start of search ===========
% 38.65/38.85
% 38.65/38.85
% 38.65/38.85 Changing weight limit from 60 to 59.
% 38.65/38.85
% 38.65/38.85 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 38.65/38.85
% 38.65/38.85 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 38.65/38.85
% 38.65/38.85 Resetting weight limit to 59 after 275 givens.
% 38.65/38.85
% 39.39/39.60
% 39.39/39.60
% 39.39/39.60 Changing weight limit from 59 to 58.
% 39.39/39.60
% 39.39/39.60 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 290 givens.
% 39.39/39.60
% 50.09/50.29
% 50.09/50.29
% 50.09/50.29 Changing weight limit from 58 to 57.
% 50.09/50.29
% 50.09/50.29 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 310 givens.
% 50.09/50.29
% 52.98/53.21
% 52.98/53.21
% 52.98/53.21 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 52.98/53.21
% 52.98/53.21 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 315 givens.
% 52.98/53.21
% 63.89/64.14
% 63.89/64.14
% 63.89/64.14 Changing weight limit from 56 to 55.
% 63.89/64.14
% 63.89/64.14 Resetting weight limit to 55 after 340 givens.
% 63.89/64.14
% 67.80/68.03
% 67.80/68.03
% 67.80/68.03 Changing weight limit from 55 to 54.
% 67.80/68.03
% 67.80/68.03 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 355 givens.
% 67.80/68.03
% 102.40/102.60
% 102.40/102.60
% 102.40/102.60 Changing weight limit from 54 to 53.
% 102.40/102.60
% 102.40/102.60 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 395 givens.
% 102.40/102.60
% 118.61/118.78
% 118.61/118.78
% 118.61/118.78 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 118.61/118.78
% 118.61/118.78 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 425 givens.
% 118.61/118.78
% 127.20/127.37
% 127.20/127.37
% 127.20/127.37 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 127.20/127.37
% 127.20/127.37 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 470 givens.
% 127.20/127.37
% 158.80/158.99
% 158.80/158.99
% 158.80/158.99 Changing weight limit from 51 to 52.
% 158.80/158.99
% 158.80/158.99 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 500 givens.
% 158.80/158.99
% 165.11/165.33
% 165.11/165.33
% 165.11/165.33 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 165.11/165.33
% 165.11/165.33 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 505 givens.
% 165.11/165.33
% 189.96/190.12
% 189.96/190.12
% 189.96/190.12 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 189.96/190.12
% 189.96/190.12 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 530 givens.
% 189.96/190.12
% 266.99/267.20
% 266.99/267.20
% 266.99/267.20 Changing weight limit from 50 to 51.
% 266.99/267.20
% 266.99/267.20 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 595 givens.
% 266.99/267.20
% 274.65/274.87
% 274.65/274.87
% 274.65/274.87 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 274.65/274.87
% 274.65/274.87 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 600 givens.
% 274.65/274.87
% 295.88/296.07
% 295.88/296.07
% 295.88/296.07 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 295.88/296.07
% 295.88/296.07 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 610 givens.
% 295.88/296.07
% 300.09/300.25 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------