TSTP Solution File: SYN780-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN780-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:48:06 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12721/SYN/SYN780-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 28] [nf = 14] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 392] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3504] [nf = 228] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19526] [nf = 488] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 156880] [nf = 870] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 294234] [nf = 1252] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 431588] [nf = 1634] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 568942] [nf = 2016] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 706296] [nf = 2398] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 843650] [nf = 2780] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 981004] [nf = 3162] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1118358] [nf = 3544] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1255712] [nf = 3926] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1393066] [nf = 4308] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1530420] [nf = 4690] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1667774] [nf = 5072] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1805128] [nf = 5454] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1942482] [nf = 5836] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2079836] [nf = 6218] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2217190] [nf = 6600] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2354544] [nf = 6982] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2491898] [nf = 7364] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2629252] [nf = 7746] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2766606] [nf = 8128] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2903960] [nf = 8510] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041314] [nf = 8892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041314] [nf = 8892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041314] [nf = 8892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041314] [nf = 8892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041342] [nf = 8892] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3041476] [nf = 9006] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3042466] [nf = 9524] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3051006] [nf = 10748] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3094858] [nf = 13012] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3459566] [nf = 16322] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3829364] [nf = 2
% 5940] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4248052] [nf = 117896] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 5020822] [nf = 625004] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 7511656] [nf = 4960304] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 64 secs [nr = 17806978] [nf = 9301772] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 105 secs [nr = 28122352] [nf = 13686260] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 146 secs [nr = 38541622] [nf = 18271244] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 189 secs [nr = 49489204] [nf = 23373476] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 251 secs [nr = 64392466] [nf = 36697532] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 120556148
% resolvents: 76212995 factors: 44343153
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 2169766 [5] = 6223332 [6] = 17198725 [7] = 36577136 [8] = 44361570 [9] = 14025619
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 33614050
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 120556148
% Number of unification failures: 203403918
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 221155228
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 9437496
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 323960066
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 401854
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------