TSTP Solution File: SYN779-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN779-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:47:03 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP8032/SYN/SYN779-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 220] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4268] [nf = 224] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30004] [nf = 578] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 240268] [nf = 1088] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 450532] [nf = 1598] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 660796] [nf = 2108] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 871060] [nf = 2618] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1081324] [nf = 3128] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1291588] [nf = 3638] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1501852] [nf = 4148] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1712116] [nf = 4658] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1922380] [nf = 5168] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2132644] [nf = 5678] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2342908] [nf = 6188] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2553172] [nf = 6698] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2763436] [nf = 7208] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2973700] [nf = 7718] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3183964] [nf = 8228] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3394228] [nf = 8738] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3604492] [nf = 9248] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3814756] [nf = 9758] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 4025020] [nf = 10268] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4235284] [nf = 10778] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4445548] [nf = 11288] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655812] [nf = 11798] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655812] [nf = 11798] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655812] [nf = 11798] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655812] [nf = 11798] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655816] [nf = 11798] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4655854] [nf = 11876] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4656480] [nf = 12630] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4667198] [nf = 14502] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4737330] [nf = 17740] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 5283528] [nf = 21206] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 13 sec
% s [nr = 5830532] [nf = 27086] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 6400490] [nf = 79142] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 7164734] [nf = 349222] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 9012806] [nf = 2332902] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 46 secs [nr = 15673778] [nf = 4316582] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 69 secs [nr = 22338818] [nf = 6314662] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 93 secs [nr = 29058554] [nf = 8447670] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 118 secs [nr = 36012722] [nf = 10876022] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 147 secs [nr = 43863866] [nf = 15296758] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 188 secs [nr = 55592642] [nf = 19717494] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 230 secs [nr = 67321418] [nf = 24138230] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 271 secs [nr = 79050194] [nf = 28558966] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 120317850
% resolvents: 88278858 factors: 32038992
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 4323694 [5] = 7587987 [6] = 25661741 [7] = 42443382 [8] = 32060410 [9] = 8240636
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 6425134
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 120317850
% Number of unification failures: 211355886
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 99352441
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 42416
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 331673736
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 401060
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------