TSTP Solution File: SYN778-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN778-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:46:09 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15359/SYN/SYN778-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 238] [nf = 46] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3900] [nf = 226] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37692] [nf = 564] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 255924] [nf = 1062] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 474156] [nf = 1560] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 692388] [nf = 2058] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 910620] [nf = 2556] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 1128852] [nf = 3054] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1347084] [nf = 3552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1565316] [nf = 4050] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1783548] [nf = 4548] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 2001780] [nf = 5046] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2220012] [nf = 5544] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2438244] [nf = 6042] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2656476] [nf = 6540] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2874708] [nf = 7038] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3092940] [nf = 7536] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3311172] [nf = 8034] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3529404] [nf = 8532] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 3747636] [nf = 9030] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3965868] [nf = 9528] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 4184100] [nf = 10026] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4402332] [nf = 10524] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 4620564] [nf = 11022] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838796] [nf = 11520] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838796] [nf = 11520] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838796] [nf = 11520] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838796] [nf = 11520] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838804] [nf = 11528] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4838870] [nf = 11626] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4839522] [nf = 12306] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4849592] [nf = 14094] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4933810] [nf = 17304] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 5481170] [nf = 20948] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 13 s
% ecs [nr = 6031042] [nf = 29248] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 15 secs [nr = 6618612] [nf = 118236] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 7633082] [nf = 669056] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 10908292] [nf = 4028404] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 67 secs [nr = 20866518] [nf = 6834216] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 112 secs [nr = 32941076] [nf = 10215884] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 157 secs [nr = 45098710] [nf = 13747576] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 203 secs [nr = 57509568] [nf = 17660652] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 259 secs [nr = 72023930] [nf = 25999568] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 113793213
% resolvents: 82841188 factors: 30952025
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 3685410 [5] = 7818222 [6] = 27845232 [7] = 35563179 [8] = 30975158 [9] = 7906012
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 14593910
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1086360
% Number of successful unifications: 113793213
% Number of unification failures: 244897567
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 94073888
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 728566
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 358690780
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 379311
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------