TSTP Solution File: SYN772-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : SYN772-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:43:26 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.05s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14809/SYN/SYN772-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 14] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 132] [nf = 38] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 362] [nf = 86] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 592] [nf = 134] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 822] [nf = 182] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1052] [nf = 230] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1282] [nf = 278] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1512] [nf = 326] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1742] [nf = 374] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1972] [nf = 422] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2202] [nf = 470] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2432] [nf = 518] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2662] [nf = 566] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2892] [nf = 614] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3122] [nf = 662] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3352] [nf = 710] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3582] [nf = 758] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 3812] [nf = 806] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4042] [nf = 854] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4272] [nf = 902] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4502] [nf = 950] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4732] [nf = 998] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4962] [nf = 1046] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5192] [nf = 1094] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5422] [nf = 1142] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5652] [nf = 1190] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5882] [nf = 1238] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5882] [nf = 1238] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5882] [nf = 1238] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5896] [nf = 1238] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5968] [nf = 1264] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6240] [nf = 1348] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 6776] [nf = 1444] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7410] [nf = 1622] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10182] [nf = 4138] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 30220] [nf = 13679] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 169435] [nf = 30176] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 566004] [nf = 51042] [nu = 0] [ut
%  = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 1308523] [nf = 264411] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 11 secs [nr = 3922946] [nf = 2402388] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 95 secs [nr = 34173389] [nf = 15362275] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 140990817
% 	resolvents: 114095103	factors: 26895714
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2		
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 7306	[5] = 121578	[6] = 3263312	[7] = 21139908	[8] = 51674621	[9] = 38400143	
% [10] = 19101271	[11] = 6624956	[12] = 657722	
% Average size of a generated clause: 9.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] ssRr_2		(+)2	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)2	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1639868815
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 3306909
% Number of successful unifications: 140990817
% Number of unification failures: 154783274
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 122601189
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3467443
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 14
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 295774091
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 469969
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------