TSTP Solution File: SYN770-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN770-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:42:52 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31904/SYN/SYN770-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 76] [nf = 14] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3788] [nf = 182] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20534] [nf = 416] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 109544] [nf = 742] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 198554] [nf = 1068] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 287564] [nf = 1394] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 376574] [nf = 1720] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 465584] [nf = 2046] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 554594] [nf = 2372] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 643604] [nf = 2698] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 732614] [nf = 3024] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 821624] [nf = 3350] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 910634] [nf = 3676] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 999644] [nf = 4002] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 1088654] [nf = 4328] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1177664] [nf = 4654] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1266674] [nf = 4980] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1355684] [nf = 5306] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1444694] [nf = 5632] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1533704] [nf = 5958] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1622714] [nf = 6284] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1711724] [nf = 6610] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1800734] [nf = 6936] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1889744] [nf = 7262] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978754] [nf = 7588] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978754] [nf = 7588] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978754] [nf = 7588] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978754] [nf = 7588] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978754] [nf = 7588] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1978766] [nf = 7616] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1979070] [nf = 8278] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1989210] [nf = 9490] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 2031948] [nf = 11488] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2268144] [nf = 13578] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2504340] [nf = 15668] [nu = 0] [ut
% = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2740645] [nf = 19345] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3409202] [nf = 143255] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 118 secs [nr = 51412637] [nf = 798232] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 131398220
% resolvents: 130582976 factors: 815244
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 749816 [5] = 5970979 [6] = 41402359 [7] = 50155214 [8] = 24502633 [9] = 6621874
% [10] = 1544418 [11] = 258956 [12] = 179811 [13] = 11990 [14] = 170
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)2 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1352701908
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 131398220
% Number of unification failures: 214324569
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1015597
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1231
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 17
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 7
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 6
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.17
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 345722789
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 437994
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------