TSTP Solution File: SYN761-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN761-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.03s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYN761-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:27:24 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.75/0.97 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.75/0.97 The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.75/0.97 Mon Jul 11 14:27:24 2022
% 0.75/0.97 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 17350.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.75/0.97 set(auto).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.75/0.97 clear(print_given).
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 list(usable).
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.75/0.97 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.75/0.97 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.75/0.97 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 ------------> process usable:
% 0.75/0.97 68 back subsumes 65.
% 0.75/0.97 73 back subsumes 72.
% 0.75/0.97 92 back subsumes 90.
% 0.75/0.97 100 back subsumes 51.
% 0.75/0.97 102 back subsumes 101.
% 0.75/0.97 106 back subsumes 105.
% 0.75/0.97 108 back subsumes 106.
% 0.75/0.97 124 back subsumes 123.
% 0.75/0.97 126 back subsumes 124.
% 0.75/0.97 170 back subsumes 151.
% 0.75/0.97 176 back subsumes 145.
% 0.75/0.97 187 back subsumes 184.
% 0.75/0.97 245 back subsumes 243.
% 0.75/0.97 248 back subsumes 245.
% 0.75/0.97 260 back subsumes 168.
% 0.75/0.97 260 back subsumes 167.
% 0.75/0.97 270 back subsumes 231.
% 0.75/0.97 277 back subsumes 274.
% 0.75/0.97 282 back subsumes 281.
% 0.75/0.97 284 back subsumes 282.
% 0.75/0.97 284 back subsumes 277.
% 0.75/0.97 286 back subsumes 197.
% 0.75/0.97 289 back subsumes 200.
% 0.75/0.97 291 back subsumes 288.
% 0.75/0.97 295 back subsumes 291.
% 0.75/0.97 295 back subsumes 205.
% 0.75/0.97 295 back subsumes 204.
% 0.75/0.97 295 back subsumes 201.
% 0.75/0.97 295 back subsumes 199.
% 0.75/0.97 300 back subsumes 144.
% 0.75/0.97 305 back subsumes 302.
% 0.75/0.97 309 back subsumes 305.
% 0.75/0.97 314 back subsumes 216.
% 0.75/0.97 331 back subsumes 328.
% 0.75/0.97 335 back subsumes 331.
% 0.75/0.97 353 back subsumes 352.
% 0.75/0.97 470 back subsumes 469.
% 0.75/0.97 472 back subsumes 470.
% 0.75/0.97 491 back subsumes 490.
% 0.75/0.97 491 back subsumes 401.
% 0.75/0.97 491 back subsumes 400.
% 0.75/0.97 493 back subsumes 491.
% 0.75/0.97 493 back subsumes 398.
% 0.75/0.97 495 back subsumes 403.
% 0.75/0.97 511 back subsumes 510.
% 0.75/0.97 513 back subsumes 511.
% 0.75/0.97 525 back subsumes 414.
% 0.75/0.97 527 back subsumes 415.
% 0.75/0.97 548 back subsumes 547.
% 0.75/0.97 548 back subsumes 147.
% 0.75/0.97 550 back subsumes 548.
% 0.75/0.97 550 back subsumes 373.
% 0.75/0.97 552 back subsumes 146.
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 ------------> process sos:
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.81/1.02 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.81/1.02 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.81/1.02 number of clauses in intial UL: 549
% 0.81/1.02 number of clauses initially in problem: 550
% 0.81/1.02 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 0.81/1.02 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.81/1.02 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.81/1.02 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.81/1.02 distinct predicate count: 5
% 0.81/1.02 distinct function count: 1
% 0.81/1.02 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.81/1.02
% 0.81/1.02 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------