TSTP Solution File: SYN761-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN761-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:41:24 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11657/SYN/SYN761-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 434] [nf = 132] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2998] [nf = 474] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13362] [nf = 1022] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54876] [nf = 1730] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 96390] [nf = 2438] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 137904] [nf = 3146] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 179418] [nf = 3854] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 220932] [nf = 4562] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 262446] [nf = 5270] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 303960] [nf = 5978] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 345474] [nf = 6686] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 386988] [nf = 7394] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 428502] [nf = 8102] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 470016] [nf = 8810] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 511530] [nf = 9518] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 553044] [nf = 10226] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 594558] [nf = 10934] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 636072] [nf = 11642] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 677586] [nf = 12350] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 719100] [nf = 13058] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 760614] [nf = 13766] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 802128] [nf = 14474] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 843642] [nf = 15182] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 885156] [nf = 15890] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926670] [nf = 16598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926670] [nf = 16598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926670] [nf = 16598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926670] [nf = 16598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926678] [nf = 16598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 926744] [nf = 16746] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 927616] [nf = 17404] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 932836] [nf = 18830] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 954606] [nf = 21062] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1043040] [nf = 24004] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 11356
% 80] [nf = 43086] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1288592] [nf = 132862] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1672236] [nf = 429734] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2781952] [nf = 1685574] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 7038332] [nf = 2944654] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 39 secs [nr = 11329008] [nf = 4318190] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 56 secs [nr = 15850252] [nf = 6134142] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 77 secs [nr = 21318584] [nf = 9430414] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 134 secs [nr = 33036228] [nf = 28840574] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 270 secs [nr = 60665872] [nf = 48250734] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 120237322
% resolvents: 67369585 factors: 52867737
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 617645 [5] = 4769711 [6] = 16993393 [7] = 29201389 [8] = 52861594 [9] = 15793590
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 30033386
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 120237322
% Number of unification failures: 64446592
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 186770811
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 550572
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 184683914
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 400791
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------