TSTP Solution File: SYN759-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN759-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:27 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.02s 300.19s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN759-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 12:55:42 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.15/1.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 1.15/1.34  The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 1.15/1.34  Mon Jul 11 12:55:43 2022
% 1.15/1.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 16078.
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.15/1.34  set(auto).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 1.15/1.34  clear(print_given).
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  list(usable).
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=10.
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 1.15/1.34  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 1.15/1.34  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.15/1.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  ------------> process usable:
% 1.15/1.34  53 back subsumes 52.
% 1.15/1.34  77 back subsumes 66.
% 1.15/1.34  108 back subsumes 72.
% 1.15/1.34  108 back subsumes 71.
% 1.15/1.34  124 back subsumes 85.
% 1.15/1.34  124 back subsumes 75.
% 1.15/1.34  124 back subsumes 74.
% 1.15/1.34  125 back subsumes 69.
% 1.15/1.34  162 back subsumes 161.
% 1.15/1.34  163 back subsumes 153.
% 1.15/1.34  163 back subsumes 152.
% 1.15/1.34  163 back subsumes 151.
% 1.15/1.34  190 back subsumes 187.
% 1.15/1.34  195 back subsumes 115.
% 1.15/1.34  201 back subsumes 198.
% 1.15/1.34  204 back subsumes 203.
% 1.15/1.34  261 back subsumes 252.
% 1.15/1.34  262 back subsumes 260.
% 1.15/1.34  262 back subsumes 251.
% 1.15/1.34  262 back subsumes 250.
% 1.15/1.34  265 back subsumes 262.
% 1.15/1.34  270 back subsumes 268.
% 1.15/1.34  272 back subsumes 235.
% 1.15/1.34  273 back subsumes 270.
% 1.15/1.34  273 back subsumes 239.
% 1.15/1.34  273 back subsumes 238.
% 1.15/1.34  288 back subsumes 103.
% 1.15/1.34  290 back subsumes 105.
% 1.15/1.34  301 back subsumes 300.
% 1.15/1.34  304 back subsumes 301.
% 1.15/1.34  304 back subsumes 122.
% 1.15/1.34  304 back subsumes 121.
% 1.15/1.34  307 back subsumes 157.
% 1.15/1.34  307 back subsumes 131.
% 1.15/1.34  341 back subsumes 143.
% 1.15/1.34  348 back subsumes 347.
% 1.15/1.34  350 back subsumes 348.
% 1.15/1.34  350 back subsumes 343.
% 1.15/1.34  383 back subsumes 381.
% 1.15/1.34  387 back subsumes 383.
% 1.15/1.34  387 back subsumes 373.
% 1.15/1.34  472 back subsumes 471.
% 1.15/1.34  475 back subsumes 474.
% 1.15/1.34  530 back subsumes 524.
% 1.15/1.34  625 back subsumes 623.
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  ------------> process sos:
% 1.15/1.34  
% 1.15/1.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.19/1.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.19/1.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.19/1.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 688
% 1.19/1.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 689
% 1.19/1.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 99
% 1.19/1.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 1.19/1.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.19/1.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 1.19/1.41     distinct predicate count: 5
% 1.19/1.41     distinct function count: 1
% 1.19/1.41     distinct constant count: 0
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  
% 1.19/1.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.19  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------