TSTP Solution File: SYN759-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN759-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:41:13 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 6.83s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11467/SYN/SYN759-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 189] [nf = 62] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2978] [nf = 372] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19630] [nf = 1038] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 63916] [nf = 1858] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 108202] [nf = 2678] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 152488] [nf = 3498] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 196774] [nf = 4318] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 241060] [nf = 5138] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 285346] [nf = 5958] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 329632] [nf = 6778] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 373918] [nf = 7598] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 418204] [nf = 8418] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 462490] [nf = 9238] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 506776] [nf = 10058] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 551062] [nf = 10878] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 595348] [nf = 11698] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 639634] [nf = 12518] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 683920] [nf = 13338] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 728206] [nf = 14158] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 772492] [nf = 14978] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 816778] [nf = 15798] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 861064] [nf = 16618] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 905350] [nf = 17438] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 949636] [nf = 18258] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993922] [nf = 19078] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993922] [nf = 19078] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993922] [nf = 19078] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993922] [nf = 19078] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993922] [nf = 19078] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 993949] [nf = 19136] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 994399] [nf = 19714] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1000118] [nf = 21502] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1035130] [nf = 24210] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1129706] [nf = 27072] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1
% 224282] [nf = 29934] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1318858] [nf = 32796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1413434] [nf = 35658] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1508010] [nf = 38520] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1602586] [nf = 41382] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1697162] [nf = 44244] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1791738] [nf = 47106] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1886314] [nf = 49968] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1980890] [nf = 52830] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2075466] [nf = 55692] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2170042] [nf = 58554] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2264618] [nf = 61416] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2359194] [nf = 64278] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2453770] [nf = 67140] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2548346] [nf = 70002] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2642922] [nf = 72864] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2737498] [nf = 75726] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2832074] [nf = 78588] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2926650] [nf = 81450] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3021226] [nf = 84312] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 3115802] [nf = 87174] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 3202976
% resolvents: 3115802 factors: 87174
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 976152 [5] = 1183794 [6] = 698594 [7] = 266956 [8] = 68694 [9] = 8786
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2528
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 3202976
% Number of unification failures: 906312
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 4928
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 0
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 12
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 4109288
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 533829
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 7 secs
% CPU time: 6.82 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------