TSTP Solution File: SYN748-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN748-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:35:25 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14375/SYN/SYN748-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 245] [nf = 94] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2316] [nf = 362] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10804] [nf = 784] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41868] [nf = 1330] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 72932] [nf = 1876] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 103996] [nf = 2422] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 135060] [nf = 2968] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 166124] [nf = 3514] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 197188] [nf = 4060] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 228252] [nf = 4606] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 259316] [nf = 5152] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 290380] [nf = 5698] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 321444] [nf = 6244] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 352508] [nf = 6790] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 383572] [nf = 7336] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 414636] [nf = 7882] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 445700] [nf = 8428] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 476764] [nf = 8974] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 507828] [nf = 9520] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 538892] [nf = 10066] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 569956] [nf = 10612] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 601020] [nf = 11158] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 632084] [nf = 11704] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 663148] [nf = 12250] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694212] [nf = 12796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694212] [nf = 12796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694212] [nf = 12796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694212] [nf = 12796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694220] [nf = 12796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694277] [nf = 12876] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 694809] [nf = 13364] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 699026] [nf = 14464] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 716700] [nf = 16174] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 783070] [nf = 18612] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 852854] [nf = 31156] [
% nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 961374] [nf = 104496] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1271326] [nf = 370888] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2190054] [nf = 1275296] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 5057078] [nf = 2184600] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 7953646] [nf = 3171424] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 35 secs [nr = 11059662] [nf = 4590344] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 50 secs [nr = 14922014] [nf = 7279776] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 87 secs [nr = 23494894] [nf = 20680216] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 170 secs [nr = 42440958] [nf = 34080656] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 253 secs [nr = 61387022] [nf = 47481096] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 128403843
% resolvents: 72819481 factors: 55584362
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 486187 [5] = 4002890 [6] = 18081499 [7] = 32577648 [8] = 55578675 [9] = 17676944
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 20817302
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 128403843
% Number of unification failures: 69824681
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 181605623
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1614590
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 198228524
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 428013
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------