TSTP Solution File: SYN747-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN747-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:35:15 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10983/SYN/SYN747-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 195] [nf = 74] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2454] [nf = 346] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11149] [nf = 786] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47478] [nf = 1380] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 83807] [nf = 1974] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120136] [nf = 2568] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 156465] [nf = 3162] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 192794] [nf = 3756] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 229123] [nf = 4350] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 265452] [nf = 4944] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 301781] [nf = 5538] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 338110] [nf = 6132] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 374439] [nf = 6726] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 410768] [nf = 7320] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 447097] [nf = 7914] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 483426] [nf = 8508] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 519755] [nf = 9102] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 556084] [nf = 9696] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 592413] [nf = 10290] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 628742] [nf = 10884] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 665071] [nf = 11478] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 701400] [nf = 12072] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 737729] [nf = 12666] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 774058] [nf = 13260] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810387] [nf = 13854] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810387] [nf = 13854] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810387] [nf = 13854] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810387] [nf = 13854] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810395] [nf = 13862] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810448] [nf = 13932] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 810862] [nf = 14440] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 815496] [nf = 15610] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 833756] [nf = 17512] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 911716] [nf = 20338] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 993216] [nf = 30060
% ] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1104344] [nf = 110614] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1479908] [nf = 408600] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 8 secs [nr = 2623584] [nf = 1675418] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 19 secs [nr = 6058708] [nf = 2706172] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 34 secs [nr = 10397480] [nf = 3986958] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 48 secs [nr = 14830428] [nf = 5528144] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 65 secs [nr = 19704760] [nf = 7502938] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 98 secs [nr = 28063748] [nf = 17743788] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 168 secs [nr = 44180304] [nf = 28613486] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 289 secs [nr = 71024284] [nf = 47667568] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 124824636
% resolvents: 74738489 factors: 50086147
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 549003 [5] = 4381980 [6] = 18747718 [7] = 36544722 [8] = 50083551 [9] = 14517662
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 18231470
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2127983
% Number of successful unifications: 124824636
% Number of unification failures: 73614540
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 144088614
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 812925
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 198439176
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 416082
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------