TSTP Solution File: SYN745-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN745-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:34:10 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 58.54s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14225/SYN/SYN745-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 181] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1422] [nf = 226] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6450] [nf = 494] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 49228] [nf = 976] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 92006] [nf = 1458] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 134784] [nf = 1940] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 177562] [nf = 2422] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 220340] [nf = 2904] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 263118] [nf = 3386] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 305896] [nf = 3868] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 348674] [nf = 4350] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 391452] [nf = 4832] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 434230] [nf = 5314] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 477008] [nf = 5796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 519786] [nf = 6278] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 562564] [nf = 6760] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 605342] [nf = 7242] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 648120] [nf = 7724] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 690898] [nf = 8206] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 733676] [nf = 8688] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 776454] [nf = 9170] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 819232] [nf = 9652] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 862010] [nf = 10134] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 904788] [nf = 10616] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947566] [nf = 11098] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947566] [nf = 11098] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947566] [nf = 11098] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947566] [nf = 11098] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947570] [nf = 11098] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947603] [nf = 11158] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 947983] [nf = 11458] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 950520] [nf = 12138] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 961138] [nf = 13700] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 1053288] [nf = 15524] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 1145968] [nf = 19506] [nu = 0] [ut =
% 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 1245784] [nf = 30988] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1363280] [nf = 63330] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1578240] [nf = 322928] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 2216344] [nf = 582526] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2855840] [nf = 847188] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3498120] [nf = 1112618] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4145872] [nf = 1388992] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 4912856] [nf = 2003190] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 18 secs [nr = 5918304] [nf = 2617388] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 22 secs [nr = 6923752] [nf = 3231586] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 7929200] [nf = 3845784] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 29 secs [nr = 8934648] [nf = 4459982] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 9940096] [nf = 5074180] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 10945544] [nf = 5688378] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 40 secs [nr = 11950992] [nf = 6302576] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 44 secs [nr = 12956440] [nf = 6916774] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 48 secs [nr = 13961888] [nf = 7530972] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 51 secs [nr = 14967336] [nf = 8145170] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 55 secs [nr = 15972784] [nf = 8759368] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 59 secs [nr = 16978232] [nf = 9373566] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 26351798
% resolvents: 16978232 factors: 9373566
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 911736 [5] = 1865402 [6] = 3470996 [7] = 7832320 [8] = 9391508 [9] = 2879836
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssPv5_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] ssPv6_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] ssPv7_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] ssPv8_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 1238978
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 26351798
% Number of unification failures: 16887174
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 43425686
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1263302
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 43238972
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 454341
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 59 secs
% CPU time: 58.52 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------