TSTP Solution File: SYN741-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN741-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:33:36 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 47.83s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11281/SYN/SYN741-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2] [nf = 2] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 221] [nf = 62] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2054] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8951] [nf = 626] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38424] [nf = 1096] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 67897] [nf = 1566] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 97370] [nf = 2036] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 126843] [nf = 2506] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 156316] [nf = 2976] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 185789] [nf = 3446] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 215262] [nf = 3916] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 244735] [nf = 4386] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 274208] [nf = 4856] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 303681] [nf = 5326] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 333154] [nf = 5796] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 362627] [nf = 6266] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 392100] [nf = 6736] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 421573] [nf = 7206] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 451046] [nf = 7676] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 480519] [nf = 8146] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 509992] [nf = 8616] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 539465] [nf = 9086] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 568938] [nf = 9556] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 598411] [nf = 10026] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 627884] [nf = 10496] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657357] [nf = 10966] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657357] [nf = 10966] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657357] [nf = 10966] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657357] [nf = 10966] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657359] [nf = 10966] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657386] [nf = 11040] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 657844] [nf = 11466] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 661562] [nf = 12400] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 675964] [nf = 13918] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 738950] [nf = 15560] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 802288] [nf = 19064] [nu = 0] [ut = 1
% ]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 873178] [nf = 36590] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 993208] [nf = 89076] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1217846] [nf = 248194] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1749300] [nf = 407312] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 2280898] [nf = 567006] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2817104] [nf = 743692] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3385662] [nf = 952058] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 4057612] [nf = 1379016] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 5087258] [nf = 1805974] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 17 secs [nr = 6116904] [nf = 2232932] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 20 secs [nr = 7146550] [nf = 2659890] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 23 secs [nr = 8176196] [nf = 3086848] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 26 secs [nr = 9205842] [nf = 3513806] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 30 secs [nr = 10235488] [nf = 3940764] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 33 secs [nr = 11265134] [nf = 4367722] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 12294780] [nf = 4794680] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 39 secs [nr = 13324426] [nf = 5221638] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 42 secs [nr = 14354072] [nf = 5648596] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 45 secs [nr = 15383718] [nf = 6075554] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 48 secs [nr = 16413364] [nf = 6502512] [nu = 0] [ut = 1]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 22915876
% resolvents: 16413364 factors: 6502512
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 1
% Total = 1
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [4] = 646784 [5] = 2128788 [6] = 5215802 [7] = 6805260 [8] = 6497874 [9] = 1621368
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssPv1_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] ssPv2_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] ssPv3_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] ssPv4_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] ssRr_2 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 835416
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 22915876
% Number of unification failures: 11218304
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 21258060
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1125994
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 2
% Number of states in UCFA table: 5
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 3
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.67
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 34134180
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 487572
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 48 secs
% CPU time: 47.82 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------