TSTP Solution File: SYN729+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 11:59:14 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.93s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  108 (  36   ~;  22   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (  29   !;  14   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f20,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    p(sK0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p(X1)
        | ~ l(sK0,X1) )
    & p(sK0)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( p(h(X2))
          & p(g(X2)) )
        | ~ p(X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ( p(sK1(X3))
          & l(X3,g(h(sK1(X3)))) )
        | ~ p(X3) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ! [X1] :
            ( ~ p(X1)
            | ~ l(X0,X1) )
        & p(X0) )
   => ( ! [X1] :
          ( ~ p(X1)
          | ~ l(sK0,X1) )
      & p(sK0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ( p(X4)
            & l(X3,g(h(X4))) )
          | ~ p(X3) )
     => ( ( p(sK1(X3))
          & l(X3,g(h(sK1(X3)))) )
        | ~ p(X3) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
        ( ! [X1] :
            ( ~ p(X1)
            | ~ l(X0,X1) )
        & p(X0) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ( p(h(X2))
          & p(g(X2)) )
        | ~ p(X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( p(X4)
          & l(X3,g(h(X4))) )
        | ~ p(X3) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ! [X4] :
            ( ~ p(X4)
            | ~ l(X3,X4) )
        & p(X3) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ( p(h(X0))
          & p(g(X0)) )
        | ~ p(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( p(X2)
          & l(X1,g(h(X2))) )
        | ~ p(X1) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X3] :
        ( ! [X4] :
            ( ~ p(X4)
            | ~ l(X3,X4) )
        & p(X3) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ( p(h(X0))
          & p(g(X0)) )
        | ~ p(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( p(X2)
          & l(X1,g(h(X2))) )
        | ~ p(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0] :
            ( p(X0)
           => ( p(h(X0))
              & p(g(X0)) ) )
        & ! [X1] :
          ? [X2] :
            ( p(X1)
           => ( p(X2)
              & l(X1,g(h(X2))) ) ) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( p(X3)
         => ? [X4] :
              ( p(X4)
              & l(X3,X4) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X2] :
            ( p(X2)
           => ( p(h(X2))
              & p(g(X2)) ) )
        & ! [X0] :
          ? [X1] :
            ( p(X0)
           => ( p(X1)
              & l(X0,g(h(X1))) ) ) )
     => ! [X0] :
          ( p(X0)
         => ? [X1] :
              ( p(X1)
              & l(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X2] :
          ( p(X2)
         => ( p(h(X2))
            & p(g(X2)) ) )
      & ! [X0] :
        ? [X1] :
          ( p(X0)
         => ( p(X1)
            & l(X0,g(h(X1))) ) ) )
   => ! [X0] :
        ( p(X0)
       => ? [X1] :
            ( p(X1)
            & l(X0,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zrRtKb0j0X/Vampire---4.8_31005',thm72) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ~ p(sK0),
    inference(resolution,[],[f19,f11]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( p(sK1(X3))
      | ~ p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ~ p(sK1(sK0)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f18,f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( p(h(X2))
      | ~ p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ~ p(h(sK1(sK0))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f17,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( p(g(X2))
      | ~ p(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ~ p(g(h(sK1(sK0)))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f16,f14]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK0)
    | ~ p(g(h(sK1(sK0)))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f10,f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ l(sK0,X1)
      | ~ p(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( l(X3,g(h(sK1(X3))))
      | ~ p(X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 17:11:08 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.16/0.37  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.zrRtKb0j0X/Vampire---4.8_31005
% 0.70/0.92  % (31237)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31239)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/78Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31243)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/83Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31238)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/51Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31240)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/33Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31241)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31242)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/45Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31239)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31237)First to succeed.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31244)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2994ds/56Mi)
% 0.70/0.92  % (31238)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31241)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31242)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31240)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31237)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-31216"
% 0.70/0.92  % (31243)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.92  % (31244)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.70/0.93  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.70/0.93  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.70/0.93  
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Memory used [KB]: 972
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.70/0.93  % (31237)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.70/0.93  % (31216)Success in time 0.551 s
% 0.70/0.93  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------