TSTP Solution File: SYN729+1 by Princess---230619
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Princess---230619
% Problem : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 03:28:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 3.99s 1.39s
% Output : Proof 6.63s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN729+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.16/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 17:18:59 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.61 ________ _____
% 0.22/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/
% 0.22/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ )
% 0.22/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.61
% 0.22/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.61 (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.61
% 0.22/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.61 Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.61
% 0.22/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.61
% 0.22/0.62 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.65 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.65 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.65 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.06/0.98 Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.06/0.98 Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.02 Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.02 Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.02 Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.02 Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.02 Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.00/1.12 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.00/1.12 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.00/1.13 Prover 6: Proving ...
% 3.00/1.13 Prover 2: Proving ...
% 3.00/1.13 Prover 5: Proving ...
% 3.00/1.14 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.00/1.15 Prover 0: Proving ...
% 3.99/1.39 Prover 0: proved (745ms)
% 3.99/1.39
% 3.99/1.39 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.99/1.39
% 3.99/1.39 Prover 3: stopped
% 3.99/1.39 Prover 5: stopped
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 2: stopped
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 6: stopped
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 3.99/1.40 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 3.99/1.41 Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 3.99/1.43 Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 3.99/1.43 Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 3.99/1.43 Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 3.99/1.43 Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 5.06/1.46 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.06/1.47 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.47 Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.29/1.48 Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.29/1.48 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.48 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.49 Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.29/1.49 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.50 Prover 10: gave up
% 5.29/1.52 Prover 7: gave up
% 5.29/1.52 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 5.29/1.52 Prover 19: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 5.29/1.53 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.53 Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 5.29/1.54 Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 4: Found proof (size 31)
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 4: proved (917ms)
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 8: stopped
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 13: stopped
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 11: stopped
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 1: stopped
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.29/1.56 Prover 16: stopped
% 6.13/1.60 Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.13/1.60 Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.13/1.61 Prover 19: stopped
% 6.13/1.61
% 6.13/1.61 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.13/1.61
% 6.13/1.62 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.13/1.62 Assumptions after simplification:
% 6.13/1.62 ---------------------------------
% 6.26/1.62
% 6.26/1.62 (thm72)
% 6.28/1.68 ? [v0: $i] : (p(v0) = 0 & $i(v0) & ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (h(v1) =
% 6.28/1.68 v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6:
% 6.28/1.68 any] : (g(v1) = v4 & p(v4) = v5 & p(v2) = v6 & p(v1) = v3 & $i(v4) & ( ~
% 6.28/1.68 (v3 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 6.28/1.68 (g(v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: $i] : ?
% 6.28/1.68 [v6: any] : (h(v1) = v5 & p(v5) = v6 & p(v2) = v4 & p(v1) = v3 & $i(v5) &
% 6.28/1.68 ( ~ (v3 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: any] : ( ~
% 6.28/1.68 (p(v1) = v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: $i] : ?
% 6.28/1.68 [v6: any] : ? [v7: any] : (h(v3) = v4 & g(v4) = v5 & l(v1, v5) = v6 &
% 6.28/1.68 p(v3) = v7 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v7 = 0 & v6 =
% 6.28/1.68 0)))) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (l(v0, v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ? [v2: int]
% 6.28/1.68 : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & p(v1) = v2)) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (p(v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1)
% 6.28/1.68 | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : (h(v1) = v3 & g(v1) = v2 & p(v3) = 0 & p(v2)
% 6.28/1.68 = 0 & $i(v3) & $i(v2))) & ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (p(v1) = 0) | ~ $i(v1) | ?
% 6.28/1.68 [v2: int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & l(v0, v1) = v2)))
% 6.28/1.68
% 6.28/1.68 (function-axioms)
% 6.28/1.69 ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] : !
% 6.28/1.69 [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (l(v3, v2) = v1) | ~ (l(v3, v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: $i]
% 6.28/1.69 : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (h(v2) = v1) | ~ (h(v2) = v0)) &
% 6.28/1.69 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (g(v2) = v1) | ~
% 6.28/1.69 (g(v2) = v0)) & ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : !
% 6.28/1.69 [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | ~ (p(v2) = v1) | ~ (p(v2) = v0))
% 6.28/1.69
% 6.28/1.69 Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 6.28/1.69 ---------------------------------
% 6.28/1.69
% 6.28/1.69 Begin of proof
% 6.28/1.69 |
% 6.28/1.69 | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 6.28/1.69 | (1) ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] : ! [v2: $i] :
% 6.28/1.69 | (v1 = v0 | ~ (p(v2) = v1) | ~ (p(v2) = v0))
% 6.28/1.69 |
% 6.28/1.69 | DELTA: instantiating (thm72) with fresh symbol all_3_0 gives:
% 6.63/1.71 | (2) p(all_3_0) = 0 & $i(all_3_0) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (h(v0) =
% 6.63/1.71 | v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] : ?
% 6.63/1.71 | [v5: any] : (g(v0) = v3 & p(v3) = v4 & p(v1) = v5 & p(v0) = v2 &
% 6.63/1.71 | $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : !
% 6.63/1.71 | [v1: $i] : ( ~ (g(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] :
% 6.63/1.71 | ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : (h(v0) = v4 & p(v4) = v5 & p(v1) = v3 &
% 6.63/1.71 | p(v0) = v2 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3 = 0)))) & ! [v0:
% 6.63/1.71 | $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i] : ?
% 6.63/1.71 | [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : (h(v2) = v3 &
% 6.63/1.71 | g(v3) = v4 & l(v0, v4) = v5 & p(v2) = v6 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2)
% 6.63/1.71 | & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0)))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 6.63/1.71 | (l(all_3_0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) &
% 6.63/1.71 | p(v0) = v1)) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (p(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1:
% 6.63/1.71 | $i] : ? [v2: $i] : (h(v0) = v2 & g(v0) = v1 & p(v2) = 0 & p(v1) =
% 6.63/1.71 | 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1))) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (p(v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) |
% 6.63/1.71 | ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & l(all_3_0, v0) = v1))
% 6.63/1.71 |
% 6.63/1.71 | ALPHA: (2) implies:
% 6.63/1.71 | (3) $i(all_3_0)
% 6.63/1.71 | (4) p(all_3_0) = 0
% 6.63/1.72 | (5) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (l(all_3_0, v0) = 0) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v1: int] : ( ~
% 6.63/1.72 | (v1 = 0) & p(v0) = v1))
% 6.63/1.72 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: any] : ( ~ (p(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: $i]
% 6.63/1.72 | : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : ? [v6: any] : (h(v2) =
% 6.63/1.72 | v3 & g(v3) = v4 & l(v0, v4) = v5 & p(v2) = v6 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) &
% 6.63/1.72 | $i(v2) & ( ~ (v1 = 0) | (v6 = 0 & v5 = 0))))
% 6.63/1.72 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (g(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any]
% 6.63/1.72 | : ? [v3: any] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: any] : (h(v0) = v4 & p(v4) =
% 6.63/1.72 | v5 & p(v1) = v3 & p(v0) = v2 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v3
% 6.63/1.72 | = 0))))
% 6.63/1.72 | (8) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (h(v0) = v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ? [v2: any]
% 6.63/1.72 | : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: any] : ? [v5: any] : (g(v0) = v3 & p(v3) =
% 6.63/1.72 | v4 & p(v1) = v5 & p(v0) = v2 & $i(v3) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) | (v5 = 0 & v4
% 6.63/1.72 | = 0))))
% 6.63/1.72 |
% 6.63/1.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_3_0, 0, simplifying with (3), (4)
% 6.63/1.73 | gives:
% 6.63/1.73 | (9) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : (h(v0) = v1 & g(v1) = v2 &
% 6.63/1.73 | l(all_3_0, v2) = 0 & p(v0) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 6.63/1.73 |
% 6.63/1.73 | DELTA: instantiating (9) with fresh symbols all_15_0, all_15_1, all_15_2
% 6.63/1.73 | gives:
% 6.63/1.73 | (10) h(all_15_2) = all_15_1 & g(all_15_1) = all_15_0 & l(all_3_0, all_15_0)
% 6.63/1.73 | = 0 & p(all_15_2) = 0 & $i(all_15_0) & $i(all_15_1) & $i(all_15_2)
% 6.63/1.73 |
% 6.63/1.73 | ALPHA: (10) implies:
% 6.63/1.73 | (11) $i(all_15_2)
% 6.63/1.73 | (12) $i(all_15_1)
% 6.63/1.73 | (13) $i(all_15_0)
% 6.63/1.73 | (14) p(all_15_2) = 0
% 6.63/1.73 | (15) l(all_3_0, all_15_0) = 0
% 6.63/1.73 | (16) g(all_15_1) = all_15_0
% 6.63/1.73 | (17) h(all_15_2) = all_15_1
% 6.63/1.73 |
% 6.63/1.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_15_0, simplifying with (13), (15)
% 6.63/1.73 | gives:
% 6.63/1.73 | (18) ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & p(all_15_0) = v0)
% 6.63/1.73 |
% 6.63/1.73 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_15_1, all_15_0, simplifying with (12),
% 6.63/1.73 | (16) gives:
% 6.63/1.73 | (19) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: any] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: any] :
% 6.63/1.73 | (h(all_15_1) = v2 & p(v2) = v3 & p(all_15_0) = v1 & p(all_15_1) = v0 &
% 6.63/1.73 | $i(v2) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v1 = 0)))
% 6.63/1.73 |
% 6.63/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_15_2, all_15_1, simplifying with (11),
% 6.63/1.74 | (17) gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (20) ? [v0: any] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: any] : ? [v3: any] :
% 6.63/1.74 | (g(all_15_2) = v1 & p(v1) = v2 & p(all_15_1) = v3 & p(all_15_2) = v0 &
% 6.63/1.74 | $i(v1) & ( ~ (v0 = 0) | (v3 = 0 & v2 = 0)))
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | DELTA: instantiating (18) with fresh symbol all_22_0 gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (21) ~ (all_22_0 = 0) & p(all_15_0) = all_22_0
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | ALPHA: (21) implies:
% 6.63/1.74 | (22) ~ (all_22_0 = 0)
% 6.63/1.74 | (23) p(all_15_0) = all_22_0
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbols all_42_0, all_42_1, all_42_2,
% 6.63/1.74 | all_42_3 gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (24) g(all_15_2) = all_42_2 & p(all_42_2) = all_42_1 & p(all_15_1) =
% 6.63/1.74 | all_42_0 & p(all_15_2) = all_42_3 & $i(all_42_2) & ( ~ (all_42_3 = 0)
% 6.63/1.74 | | (all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0))
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 6.63/1.74 | (25) p(all_15_2) = all_42_3
% 6.63/1.74 | (26) p(all_15_1) = all_42_0
% 6.63/1.74 | (27) ~ (all_42_3 = 0) | (all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0)
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | DELTA: instantiating (19) with fresh symbols all_44_0, all_44_1, all_44_2,
% 6.63/1.74 | all_44_3 gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (28) h(all_15_1) = all_44_1 & p(all_44_1) = all_44_0 & p(all_15_0) =
% 6.63/1.74 | all_44_2 & p(all_15_1) = all_44_3 & $i(all_44_1) & ( ~ (all_44_3 = 0)
% 6.63/1.74 | | (all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0))
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 6.63/1.74 | (29) p(all_15_1) = all_44_3
% 6.63/1.74 | (30) p(all_15_0) = all_44_2
% 6.63/1.74 | (31) ~ (all_44_3 = 0) | (all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0)
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with 0, all_42_3, all_15_2, simplifying with
% 6.63/1.74 | (14), (25) gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (32) all_42_3 = 0
% 6.63/1.74 |
% 6.63/1.74 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_42_0, all_44_3, all_15_1, simplifying
% 6.63/1.74 | with (26), (29) gives:
% 6.63/1.74 | (33) all_44_3 = all_42_0
% 6.63/1.75 |
% 6.63/1.75 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_22_0, all_44_2, all_15_0, simplifying
% 6.63/1.75 | with (23), (30) gives:
% 6.63/1.75 | (34) all_44_2 = all_22_0
% 6.63/1.75 |
% 6.63/1.75 | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 6.63/1.75 |
% 6.63/1.75 | Case 1:
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | (35) ~ (all_44_3 = 0)
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | REDUCE: (33), (35) imply:
% 6.63/1.75 | | (36) ~ (all_42_0 = 0)
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | BETA: splitting (27) gives:
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | Case 1:
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | (37) ~ (all_42_3 = 0)
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | REDUCE: (32), (37) imply:
% 6.63/1.75 | | | (38) $false
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | CLOSE: (38) is inconsistent.
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | Case 2:
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | (39) all_42_0 = 0 & all_42_1 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | ALPHA: (39) implies:
% 6.63/1.75 | | | (40) all_42_0 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | REDUCE: (36), (40) imply:
% 6.63/1.75 | | | (41) $false
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent.
% 6.63/1.75 | | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | End of split
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | Case 2:
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | (42) all_44_0 = 0 & all_44_2 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | ALPHA: (42) implies:
% 6.63/1.75 | | (43) all_44_2 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | COMBINE_EQS: (34), (43) imply:
% 6.63/1.75 | | (44) all_22_0 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | SIMP: (44) implies:
% 6.63/1.75 | | (45) all_22_0 = 0
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | REDUCE: (22), (45) imply:
% 6.63/1.75 | | (46) $false
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | | CLOSE: (46) is inconsistent.
% 6.63/1.75 | |
% 6.63/1.75 | End of split
% 6.63/1.75 |
% 6.63/1.75 End of proof
% 6.63/1.75 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 6.63/1.75
% 6.63/1.75 1137ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------