TSTP Solution File: SYN728-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN728-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:18:27 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 6 unt; 5 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 12 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 20 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(thm69_1,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X1)
| ~ p(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p',thm69_1) ).
cnf(thm69_2,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1)
| p(X1,sk1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p',thm69_2) ).
cnf(thm69_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(sk2,sk2)
| ~ p(g(sk2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p',thm69_5) ).
cnf(thm69_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m(g(X1))
| ~ q(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p',thm69_4) ).
cnf(thm69_3,negated_conjecture,
( q(f(X1,sk1(X1)))
| p(X1,sk1(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p',thm69_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X1)
| ~ p(X2,X3) ),
thm69_1 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1)
| p(X1,sk1(X1)) ),
thm69_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(sk2,sk2)
| ~ p(g(sk2),X1) ),
thm69_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1)
| p(X2,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m(g(X1))
| ~ q(X1) ),
thm69_4 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
m(X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( q(f(X1,sk1(X1)))
| p(X1,sk1(X1)) ),
thm69_3 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ q(X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,sk1(X1)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p(sk2,sk2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SYN728-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:57:01 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cM7tYJSTqX/E---3.1_7722.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 7801 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 7805 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 18
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 18
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 8
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 5
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 220
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------