TSTP Solution File: SYN728+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 08:24:24 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.70s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (   2 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  123 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  144 (  55   ~;  44   |;  30   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   5 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   77 (  60   !;  17   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f22,f29,f34,f36,f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f17,f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ( ! [X6] : p(X6,X6)
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X6] : p(X6,X6) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_4])]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ p(g(sK0),X1)
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ p(g(sK0),X1) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_1])]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f28,f21]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ( ~ p(sK0,sK0)
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> p(sK0,sK0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_2])]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ~ spl2_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f31,f32]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : q(f(X3,sK1(X3)))
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f25]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ( ! [X7,X5] : ~ p(X5,X7)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ! [X5,X7] : ~ p(X5,X7) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl2_3])]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( q(f(X3,sK1(X3)))
      | p(X3,sK1(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p(sK0,sK0)
        | ~ p(g(sK0),X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ~ m(g(X2))
        | ~ q(X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ( q(f(X3,sK1(X3)))
          & m(X3) )
        | p(X3,sK1(X3)) )
    & ! [X5] :
        ( ! [X6] : p(X6,X6)
        | ! [X7] : ~ p(X5,X7) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p(X0,X0)
        | ~ p(g(X0),X1) )
   => ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p(sK0,sK0)
        | ~ p(g(sK0),X1) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ? [X4] :
          ( ( q(f(X3,X4))
            & m(X3) )
          | p(X3,X4) )
     => ( ( q(f(X3,sK1(X3)))
          & m(X3) )
        | p(X3,sK1(X3)) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( ~ p(X0,X0)
        | ~ p(g(X0),X1) )
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ~ m(g(X2))
        | ~ q(X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
      ? [X4] :
        ( ( q(f(X3,X4))
          & m(X3) )
        | p(X3,X4) )
    & ! [X5] :
        ( ! [X6] : p(X6,X6)
        | ! [X7] : ~ p(X5,X7) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( ? [X6] :
      ! [X7] :
        ( ~ p(X6,X6)
        | ~ p(g(X6),X7) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ~ m(g(X0))
        | ~ q(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( q(f(X1,X2))
          & m(X1) )
        | p(X1,X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ! [X5] : p(X5,X5)
        | ! [X4] : ~ p(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ? [X6] :
      ! [X7] :
        ( ~ p(X6,X6)
        | ~ p(g(X6),X7) )
    & ! [X0] :
        ( ~ m(g(X0))
        | ~ q(X0) )
    & ! [X1] :
      ? [X2] :
        ( ( q(f(X1,X2))
          & m(X1) )
        | p(X1,X2) )
    & ! [X3] :
        ( ! [X5] : p(X5,X5)
        | ! [X4] : ~ p(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [X0] :
            ( q(X0)
           => ~ m(g(X0)) )
        & ! [X1] :
          ? [X2] :
            ( ( q(f(X1,X2))
              & m(X1) )
            | p(X1,X2) )
        & ! [X3] :
            ( ? [X4] : p(X3,X4)
           => ! [X5] : p(X5,X5) ) )
     => ! [X6] :
        ? [X7] :
          ( p(X6,X6)
          & p(g(X6),X7) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [X5] :
            ( q(X5)
           => ~ m(g(X5)) )
        & ! [X3] :
          ? [X4] :
            ( ( q(f(X3,X4))
              & m(X3) )
            | p(X3,X4) )
        & ! [X0] :
            ( ? [X1] : p(X0,X1)
           => ! [X2] : p(X2,X2) ) )
     => ! [X6] :
        ? [X7] :
          ( p(X6,X6)
          & p(g(X6),X7) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [X5] :
          ( q(X5)
         => ~ m(g(X5)) )
      & ! [X3] :
        ? [X4] :
          ( ( q(f(X3,X4))
            & m(X3) )
          | p(X3,X4) )
      & ! [X0] :
          ( ? [X1] : p(X0,X1)
         => ! [X2] : p(X2,X2) ) )
   => ! [X6] :
      ? [X7] :
        ( p(X6,X6)
        & p(g(X6),X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm69) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ q(X0)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f30,f13]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ m(g(X2))
      | ~ q(X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : m(X3)
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f11,f25]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( m(X3)
      | p(X3,sK1(X3)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f10,f27,f24]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X5] :
      ( p(X6,X6)
      | ~ p(X5,X7) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ( spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f14,f19,f16]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ p(sK0,sK0)
      | ~ p(g(sK0),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 15:44:08 EDT 2024
% 0.21/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.36  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.21/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11462)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11463)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11464)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11465)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11461)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11466)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11467)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11461)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11464)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11462)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11465)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)First to succeed.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11463)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11466)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11467)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-11459"
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.70/0.87  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.70/0.87  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)------------------------------
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.70/0.87  
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Memory used [KB]: 971
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.70/0.87  % (11460)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.70/0.87  % (11459)Success in time 0.499 s
% 0.70/0.87  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------