TSTP Solution File: SYN728+1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:22:10 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.98s
% Output   : Refutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 07:34:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.41/0.98  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.41/0.98  Process 24152 was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 0.41/0.98  Tue Jul 12 07:34:10 2022
% 0.41/0.98  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_23999_n015.cluster.edu".
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_23999_n015.cluster.edu
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.41/0.98  set(auto2).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.41/0.98      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.41/0.98      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.41/0.98      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.41/0.98  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.41/0.98  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.41/0.98  clear(print_given).
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (1 formulas)
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.41/0.98  1 -((all X ((exists Y p(X,Y)) -> (all Z p(Z,Z)))) & (all R exists S (p(R,S) | m(R) & q(f(R,S)))) & (all W (q(W) -> -m(g(W)))) -> (all U exists V (p(g(U),V) & p(U,U)))) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.41/0.98  2 -q(A) | -m(g(A)) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  3 p(A,f1(A)) | m(A) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  Derived: -q(A) | p(g(A),f1(g(A))).  [resolve(2,b,3,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  4 -q(A) | p(g(A),f1(g(A))).  [resolve(2,b,3,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  5 p(A,f1(A)) | q(f(A,f1(A))) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  Derived: p(g(f(A,f1(A))),f1(g(f(A,f1(A))))) | p(A,f1(A)).  [resolve(4,a,5,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.41/0.98  Function symbol KB weights:  c1=1. f=1. g=1. f1=1.
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.41/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.98  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.41/0.98  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.41/0.98  % Level of proof is 8.
% 0.41/0.98  % Maximum clause weight is 16.000.
% 0.41/0.98  % Given clauses 4.
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  1 -((all X ((exists Y p(X,Y)) -> (all Z p(Z,Z)))) & (all R exists S (p(R,S) | m(R) & q(f(R,S)))) & (all W (q(W) -> -m(g(W)))) -> (all U exists V (p(g(U),V) & p(U,U)))) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture) # label(non_clause).  [assumption].
% 0.41/0.98  2 -q(A) | -m(g(A)) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  3 p(A,f1(A)) | m(A) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  4 -q(A) | p(g(A),f1(g(A))).  [resolve(2,b,3,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  5 p(A,f1(A)) | q(f(A,f1(A))) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  6 -p(g(c1),A) | -p(c1,c1) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  7 -p(A,B) | p(C,C) # label(thm69) # label(negated_conjecture).  [clausify(1)].
% 0.41/0.98  8 p(g(f(A,f1(A))),f1(g(f(A,f1(A))))) | p(A,f1(A)).  [resolve(4,a,5,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  9 p(A,f1(A)) | p(B,B).  [resolve(8,a,7,a)].
% 0.41/0.98  10 p(A,A) | p(B,B).  [resolve(9,a,7,a)].
% 0.41/0.98  11 p(A,f1(A)) | -p(c1,c1).  [resolve(9,b,6,a)].
% 0.41/0.98  12 p(A,A).  [factor(10,a,b)].
% 0.41/0.98  13 p(A,f1(A)).  [back_unit_del(11),unit_del(b,12)].
% 0.41/0.98  14 -p(g(c1),A).  [back_unit_del(6),unit_del(b,12)].
% 0.41/0.98  15 $F.  [resolve(14,a,13,a)].
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  Given=4. Generated=11. Kept=9. proofs=1.
% 0.41/0.98  Usable=1. Sos=0. Demods=0. Limbo=2, Disabled=12. Hints=0.
% 0.41/0.98  Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.41/0.98  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.41/0.98  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.41/0.98  
% 0.41/0.98  Process 24152 exit (max_proofs) Tue Jul 12 07:34:10 2022
% 0.41/0.98  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------