TSTP Solution File: SYN728+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:04:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 45 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 16 ~; 14 |; 12 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 5 sgn 16 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm69,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] :
( ? [X2] : p(X1,X2)
=> ! [X3] : p(X3,X3) )
& ! [X4] :
? [X5] :
( p(X4,X5)
| ( m(X4)
& q(f(X4,X5)) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( q(X6)
=> ~ m(g(X6)) ) )
=> ! [X7] :
? [X8] :
( p(g(X7),X8)
& p(X7,X7) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',thm69) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] :
( ? [X2] : p(X1,X2)
=> ! [X3] : p(X3,X3) )
& ! [X4] :
? [X5] :
( p(X4,X5)
| ( m(X4)
& q(f(X4,X5)) ) )
& ! [X6] :
( q(X6)
=> ~ m(g(X6)) ) )
=> ! [X7] :
? [X8] :
( p(g(X7),X8)
& p(X7,X7) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm69]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X14,X16] :
( ( ~ p(X9,X10)
| p(X11,X11) )
& ( m(X12)
| p(X12,esk1_1(X12)) )
& ( q(f(X12,esk2_1(X12)))
| p(X12,esk1_1(X12)) )
& ( ~ q(X14)
| ~ m(g(X14)) )
& ( ~ p(g(esk3_0),X16)
| ~ p(esk4_0,esk4_0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ m(g(X1))
| ~ q(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| m(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X1)
| ~ p(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( p(g(X1),esk1_1(g(X1)))
| ~ q(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X1)
| ~ q(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,esk1_1(X1))
| q(f(X1,esk2_1(X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(esk4_0,esk4_0)
| ~ p(g(esk3_0),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p(X1,X1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p(g(esk3_0),X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN728+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 07:44:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 13
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 10
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Processed clauses : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 9
% 0.23/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 5
% 0.23/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.23/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.23/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 522
% 0.23/1.41
% 0.23/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.23/1.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.23/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------