%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:23:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:39:27 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.17/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.17/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.17/0.40  SPASS derived 17 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 15 clauses.
% 0.17/0.40  SPASS allocated 63091 KBytes.
% 0.17/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.17/0.40  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.17/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.17/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.17/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.17/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  
% 0.17/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 16 :
% 0.17/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.17/0.40  1[0:Inp] || p(u,v)* p(v,w)* -> p(u,w)*.
% 0.17/0.40  2[0:Inp] || q(u,v)* q(v,w)* -> q(u,w)*.
% 0.17/0.40  3[0:Inp] || q(u,v)*+ -> q(v,u).
% 0.17/0.40  4[0:Inp] ||  -> q(u,v) p(u,v)*.
% 0.17/0.40  5[0:Inp] || p(sk1,sk2)*l+ -> .
% 0.17/0.40  6[0:Inp] || q(sk3,sk4)*l+ -> .
% 0.17/0.40  7[0:Res:4.1,5.0] ||  -> q(sk1,sk2)*l.
% 0.17/0.40  10[0:NCh:1.2,1.0,4.1,5.0] || p(u,sk2)*+ -> q(sk1,u)*.
% 0.17/0.40  11[0:Res:7.0,3.0] ||  -> q(sk2,sk1)*r.
% 0.17/0.40  15[0:NCh:2.2,2.1,11.0,3.0] || q(u,sk2)* -> q(sk1,u)*.
% 0.17/0.40  17[0:Res:4.1,10.0] ||  -> q(u,sk2)* q(sk1,u)*.
% 0.17/0.40  20[0:MRR:17.0,15.0] ||  -> q(sk1,u)*.
% 0.17/0.40  21[0:Res:20.0,3.0] ||  -> q(u,sk1)*.
% 0.17/0.40  24[0:NCh:2.2,2.1,20.0,3.0] || q(u,sk1)* -> q(v,u)*.
% 0.17/0.40  25[0:MRR:24.0,21.0] ||  -> q(u,v)*.
% 0.17/0.40  26[0:UnC:25.0,6.0] ||  -> .
% 0.17/0.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.17/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : thm400_1 thm400_2 thm400_3 thm400_4 thm400_5 thm400_6
% 0.17/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------