TSTP Solution File: SYN726-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Timeout 0.33s 300.17s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 10 unt; 5 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 40 ( 0 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(thm400_1,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2)
| ~ p(X1,X3)
| ~ p(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_1) ).
cnf(thm400_4,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2)
| q(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_4) ).
cnf(thm400_5,negated_conjecture,
~ p(sk1,sk2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_5) ).
cnf(thm400_3,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_3) ).
cnf(thm400_2,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X1,X3)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_2) ).
cnf(thm400_6,negated_conjecture,
~ q(sk3,sk4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p',thm400_6) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2)
| ~ p(X1,X3)
| ~ p(X3,X2) ),
thm400_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2)
| q(X1,X2) ),
thm400_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ p(sk1,sk2),
thm400_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| p(X3,X2)
| ~ p(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X2,X1) ),
thm400_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
q(sk1,sk2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| q(X2,X3)
| p(X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2)
| ~ q(X1,X3)
| ~ q(X3,X2) ),
thm400_2 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
q(sk2,sk1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,sk2)
| q(sk1,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,sk1)
| ~ q(X1,sk2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
q(X1,sk1),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
q(sk1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ q(sk3,sk4),
thm400_6 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
q(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_18]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 19:01:51 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hDfVRG3PnJ/E---3.1_5212.p
% 0.33/300.17 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.33/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # new_bool_3 with pid 5291 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.33/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/300.17 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.17 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5296 completed with status 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.33/300.17 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/300.17 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.33/300.17 # Search class: FGUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.33/300.17 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.33/300.17 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.33/300.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.33/300.17 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/300.17
% 0.33/300.17 # Proof found!
% 0.33/300.17 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.33/300.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/300.17 # Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.33/300.17 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Initial clauses : 6
% 0.33/300.17 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.33/300.17 # Processed clauses : 30
% 0.33/300.17 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # ...remaining for further processing : 28
% 0.33/300.17 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.33/300.17 # Backward-rewritten : 17
% 0.33/300.17 # Generated clauses : 43
% 0.33/300.17 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33
% 0.33/300.17 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # Paramodulations : 43
% 0.33/300.17 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # NegExts : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Total rewrite steps : 31
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/300.17 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.33/300.17 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 0.33/300.17 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.33/300.17 # ...number of literals in the above : 45
% 0.33/300.17 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Current number of archived clauses : 25
% 0.33/300.17 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 37
% 0.33/300.17 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37
% 0.33/300.17 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.33/300.17 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.33/300.17 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 0.33/300.17 # BW rewrite match successes : 17
% 0.33/300.17 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/300.17 # Termbank termtop insertions : 496
% 0.33/300.17
% 0.33/300.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.17 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.33/300.17 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.33/300.17 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.33/300.17 # Maximum resident set size: 1652 pages
% 0.33/300.17
% 0.33/300.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/300.17 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.33/300.17 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.33/300.17 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.33/300.17 # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.33/300.17 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------