TSTP Solution File: SYN726-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:47:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:28:43 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.41 %-------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.41 % File :CSE---1.6
% 1.26/1.41 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.41 % Transform :cnf
% 1.26/1.41 % Format :tptp:raw
% 1.26/1.41 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 % Result :Theorem 0.780000s
% 1.26/1.41 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.780000s
% 1.26/1.41 %-------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.41 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.41 % File : SYN726-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 1.26/1.41 % Domain : Syntactic
% 1.26/1.41 % Problem : Peter Andrews Problem THM400
% 1.26/1.41 % Version : Especial.
% 1.26/1.41 % English :
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 % Refs : [And97] Andrews (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 1.26/1.41 % Source : [And97]
% 1.26/1.41 % Names : THM400 [And97]
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 1.26/1.41 % Rating : 0.00 v2.5.0
% 1.26/1.41 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 2 unt; 1 nHn; 5 RR)
% 1.26/1.41 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% 1.26/1.41 % Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% 1.26/1.41 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 1.26/1.41 % Number of predicates : 2 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 1.26/1.41 % Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% 1.26/1.41 % Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% 1.26/1.41 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 % Comments :
% 1.26/1.41 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_1,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ( p(A,C)
% 1.26/1.41 | ~ p(A,B)
% 1.26/1.41 | ~ p(B,C) ) ).
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_2,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ( q(A,C)
% 1.26/1.41 | ~ q(A,B)
% 1.26/1.41 | ~ q(B,C) ) ).
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_3,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ( q(B,A)
% 1.26/1.41 | ~ q(A,B) ) ).
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_4,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ( p(A,B)
% 1.26/1.41 | q(A,B) ) ).
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_5,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ~ p(sk1,sk2) ).
% 1.26/1.41
% 1.26/1.41 cnf(thm400_6,negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/1.41 ~ q(sk3,sk4) ).
% 1.26/1.42
% 1.26/1.42 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.42 %-------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.42 % Proof found
% 1.26/1.42 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.42 % SZS output start Proof
% 1.26/1.42 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 1.26/1.42 %VarNum:20(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 1.26/1.42 %MaxLitNum:3
% 1.26/1.42 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 1.26/1.42 %SharedTerms:6
% 1.26/1.42 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6
% 1.26/1.42 %singleGoalClaCount:2
% 1.26/1.42 [1]~P1(a1,a2)
% 1.26/1.42 [2]~P2(a3,a4)
% 1.26/1.42 [3]P2(x31,x32)+P1(x31,x32)
% 1.26/1.42 [4]~P2(x42,x41)+P2(x41,x42)
% 1.26/1.42 [5]~P1(x51,x53)+P1(x51,x52)+~P1(x53,x52)
% 1.26/1.42 [6]~P2(x61,x63)+P2(x61,x62)+~P2(x63,x62)
% 1.26/1.42 %EqnAxiom
% 1.26/1.42
% 1.26/1.42 %-------------------------------------------
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(7,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a4,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(8,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(9,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a2,x91)+P2(a1,x91)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3,6])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(11,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P1(x111,a2)+~P1(a1,x111)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,4,3,6,5])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(15,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P1(a3,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,8,4,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(19,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P1(a4,x191)+P1(a3,x191)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,8,4,3,9,5])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(27,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(x271,a4)+~P2(a3,x271)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7,15,5,3,6])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(33,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(x331,a3)+~P2(a4,x331)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,6])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(35,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a4,a1)+~P2(a2,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[7,6,9])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(37,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,x371)+~P1(x371,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(38,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(x381,a3)+~P2(x381,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[27,4])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(39,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P1(a4,x391)+~P2(x391,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[33,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(41,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,a3)+~P1(a4,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[37,19])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(42,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a1,a3)+~P2(a2,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[38,9])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(108,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(x1081,a1)+~P1(x1081,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,37])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(109,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(x1091,a2)+P2(x1091,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[108,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(123,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a3,a1)+~P1(a4,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,41])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(124,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a4,a2)+P2(a3,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[123,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(177,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a2,x1771)+P2(x1771,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,109])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(178,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a2,a3)+~P2(a1,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[177,27])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(179,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P1(a1,a4)+P2(a2,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[178,3])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(191,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,x1911)+P2(x1911,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,109])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(192,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,a3)+~P2(a2,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[191,27])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(193,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,a3)+P2(a4,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[192,177])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(195,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,x1951)+P1(a4,x1951)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,39])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(219,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+~P2(a2,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,42])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(220,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+P2(a4,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[219,177])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(223,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+~P2(a1,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[220,33])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(225,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+~P2(a2,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[223,9])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(227,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P1(a1,a4)+~P2(a3,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[225,179])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(229,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+~P1(a4,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[227,11])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(231,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a3,a1)+~P2(a3,a2)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[229,195])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(234,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a2,a4)+P2(a3,a1)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,124])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(235,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a3,a1)+P2(a1,a4)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[234,9])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(251,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,x2511)+P2(a2,x2511)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,177])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(252,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (~P2(a4,a1)+P2(a1,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[251,35])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(253,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 (P2(a1,a3)),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[252,193])).
% 1.26/1.42 cnf(272,plain,
% 1.26/1.42 ($false),
% 1.26/1.42 inference(scs_inference,[],[253,38,37,4,3,251,235,231,225,220]),
% 1.26/1.42 ['proof']).
% 1.26/1.42 % SZS output end Proof
% 1.26/1.42 % Total time :0.780000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------