%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN726+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:23:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.42s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SYN726+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 03:19:49 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.42  
% 0.18/0.42  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.42  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.42  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.42  SPASS derived 17 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 15 clauses.
% 0.18/0.42  SPASS allocated 85105 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.42  SPASS spent	0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.42  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.18/0.42  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.42  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.42  
% 0.18/0.42  
% 0.18/0.42  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 16 :
% 0.18/0.42  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.18/0.42  1[0:Inp] || p(skc5,skc4)*r+ -> .
% 0.18/0.42  2[0:Inp] || q(skc7,skc6)*r+ -> .
% 0.18/0.42  3[0:Inp] ||  -> q(u,v) p(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.42  4[0:Inp] || q(u,v)*+ -> q(v,u).
% 0.18/0.42  5[0:Inp] || p(u,v)* p(v,w)* -> p(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.42  6[0:Inp] || q(u,v)* q(v,w)* -> q(u,w)*.
% 0.18/0.42  7[0:Res:3.1,1.0] ||  -> q(skc5,skc4)*r.
% 0.18/0.42  10[0:NCh:5.2,5.1,3.1,1.0] || p(skc5,u)*+ -> q(u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.42  11[0:Res:7.0,4.0] ||  -> q(skc4,skc5)*l.
% 0.18/0.42  15[0:NCh:6.2,6.0,11.0,4.0] || q(skc5,u)* -> q(u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.42  17[0:Res:3.1,10.0] ||  -> q(skc5,u) q(u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.42  20[0:MRR:17.0,15.0] ||  -> q(u,skc4)*.
% 0.18/0.42  21[0:Res:20.0,4.0] ||  -> q(skc4,u)*.
% 0.18/0.42  23[0:NCh:6.2,6.0,20.0,4.0] || q(skc4,u)* -> q(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.42  25[0:MRR:23.0,21.0] ||  -> q(u,v)*.
% 0.18/0.42  26[0:UnC:25.0,2.0] ||  -> .
% 0.18/0.42  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.18/0.42  Formulae used in the proof : thm400
% 0.18/0.42  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------