TSTP Solution File: SYN724-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN724-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:18:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 4 unt; 2 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(thm31_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p',thm31_15) ).
cnf(thm31_10,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p',thm31_10) ).
cnf(thm31_9,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk1)
| ~ r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p',thm31_9) ).
cnf(thm31_4,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk1)
| r(sk2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p',thm31_4) ).
cnf(thm31_3,negated_conjecture,
( s(X1)
| ~ r(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p',thm31_3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
thm31_15 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk1) ),
thm31_10 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk1)
| ~ r(sk2)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
thm31_9 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk1)
| r(sk2) ),
thm31_4 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(sk1)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( s(X1)
| ~ r(X1) ),
thm31_3 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( r(sk1)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(sk1)
| ~ s(sk2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ s(sk2),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ r(sk2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
r(sk1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_10]),c_0_15])]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SYN724-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:28:46 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.t9XyWZkwDS/E---3.1_5266.p
% 0.20/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # new_bool_1 with pid 5354 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 5359 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.48 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.48 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.48 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.48
% 0.20/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Processed clauses : 15
% 0.20/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.20/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.20/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.20/0.48 # Paramodulations : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 0.20/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 122
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1644 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------