%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SYN722+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:13:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  27   ~;  23   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   2 sgn   6   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm119,conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( p(X1)
            | r(X1) )
          & q(X1) )
      & ! [X2] :
        ? [X3] :
          ( p(X2)
          | ~ q(X2)
          | ~ q(X3)
          | ~ q(c)
          | ~ q(d) )
      & ( ~ p(a)
        | ~ p(b) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm119) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X1] :
            ( ( p(X1)
              | r(X1) )
            & q(X1) )
        & ! [X2] :
          ? [X3] :
            ( p(X2)
            | ~ q(X2)
            | ~ q(X3)
            | ~ q(c)
            | ~ q(d) )
        & ( ~ p(a)
          | ~ p(b) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm119]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( p(X4)
        | r(X4) )
      & q(X4)
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ q(X5)
        | ~ q(esk1_0)
        | ~ q(c)
        | ~ q(d) )
      & ( ~ p(a)
        | ~ p(b) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1)
    | ~ q(X1)
    | ~ q(esk1_0)
    | ~ q(c)
    | ~ q(d) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    q(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(a)
    | ~ p(b) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_4])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SYN722+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:25:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.37  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.37  #
% 0.13/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.37  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------