TSTP Solution File: SYN722+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SYN722+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   59 (  27   ~;  23   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   2 sgn;   6   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(thm119,conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X1] :
          ( ( p(X1)
            | r(X1) )
          & q(X1) )
      & ! [X2] :
        ? [X3] :
          ( p(X2)
          | ~ q(X2)
          | ~ q(X3)
          | ~ q(c)
          | ~ q(d) )
      & ( ~ p(a)
        | ~ p(b) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFot3KE2Ay/E---3.1_18206.p',thm119) ).

fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X1] :
            ( ( p(X1)
              | r(X1) )
            & q(X1) )
        & ! [X2] :
          ? [X3] :
            ( p(X2)
            | ~ q(X2)
            | ~ q(X3)
            | ~ q(c)
            | ~ q(d) )
        & ( ~ p(a)
          | ~ p(b) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thm119])]) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( p(X4)
        | r(X4) )
      & q(X4)
      & ( p(X5)
        | ~ q(X5)
        | ~ q(esk1_0)
        | ~ q(c)
        | ~ q(d) )
      & ( ~ p(a)
        | ~ p(b) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1)
    | ~ q(X1)
    | ~ q(esk1_0)
    | ~ q(c)
    | ~ q(d) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    q(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ p(a)
    | ~ p(b) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    p(X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_4])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem    : SYN722+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.10/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:09:28 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.hFot3KE2Ay/E---3.1_18206.p
% 0.15/0.41  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # new_bool_3 with pid 18284 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 18288 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.41  # Search class: FGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 4
% 0.15/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.15/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 7
% 0.15/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.15/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.15/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.15/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 238
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1668 pages
% 0.15/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------