TSTP Solution File: SYN721+1 by SuperZenon---0.0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:46:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.40s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN721+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 20:55:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.40 (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 0.19/0.40 (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.40 1. (r (a) (b)) (-. (r (a) (b))) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 2. (-. (Ex Y, (r (a) Y))) (r (a) (b)) ### NotExists 1
% 0.19/0.40 3. (q (a) (a)) (-. (q (a) (a))) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 4. (-. (r (b) (a))) (r (b) (a)) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 5. (All Z, (r Z (a))) (-. (r (b) (a))) ### All 4
% 0.19/0.40 6. ((q (a) (a)) => (All Z, (r Z (a)))) (-. (r (b) (a))) (q (a) (a)) ### Imply 3 5
% 0.19/0.40 7. (All V, ((q (a) V) => (All Z, (r Z V)))) (q (a) (a)) (-. (r (b) (a))) ### All 6
% 0.19/0.40 8. (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))) (-. (r (b) (a))) (q (a) (a)) ### All 7
% 0.19/0.40 9. (q (a) (a)) (-. (q (a) (a))) ### Axiom
% 0.19/0.40 10. (-. ((r (b) (a)) /\ (q (a) (a)))) (q (a) (a)) (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))) ### NotAnd 8 9
% 0.19/0.40 11. (-. (Ex W, ((r (b) W) /\ (q W (a))))) (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))) (q (a) (a)) ### NotExists 10
% 0.19/0.40 12. ((Ex Y, (r (a) Y)) => (q (a) (a))) (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))) (-. (Ex W, ((r (b) W) /\ (q W (a))))) (r (a) (b)) ### Imply 2 11
% 0.19/0.40 13. (All X, ((Ex Y, (r X Y)) => (q X X))) (r (a) (b)) (-. (Ex W, ((r (b) W) /\ (q W (a))))) (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))) ### All 12
% 0.19/0.40 14. (-. (((r (a) (b)) /\ ((All X, ((Ex Y, (r X Y)) => (q X X))) /\ (All U, (All V, ((q U V) => (All Z, (r Z V))))))) => (Ex W, ((r (b) W) /\ (q W (a)))))) ### ConjTree 13
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40 (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------