TSTP Solution File: SYN717-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN717-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:29 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 26 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p60_84,negated_conjecture,
( p60(X1,X2)
| ~ p24(X3,X1)
| ~ p60(X3,X4)
| ~ p20(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p60_84) ).
cnf(p20_29,negated_conjecture,
p20(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p20_29) ).
cnf(not_p60_107,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,X2))
| ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X3),X2)),c72)
| ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X4)),c72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',not_p60_107) ).
cnf(p59_44,negated_conjecture,
p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,c77),c78)),c72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p59_44) ).
cnf(p24_94,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4))
| ~ p22(X1,X3)
| ~ p23(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p24_94) ).
cnf(p60_42,negated_conjecture,
p60(f25(c75,c79),f21(c76,c78)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p60_42) ).
cnf(p22_28,negated_conjecture,
p22(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p22_28) ).
cnf(p23_36,negated_conjecture,
p23(c79,c77),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p',p23_36) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p60(X1,X2)
| ~ p24(X3,X1)
| ~ p60(X3,X4)
| ~ p20(X4,X2) ),
p60_84 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p20(X1,X1),
p20_29 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,X2))
| ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X3),X2)),c72)
| ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X4)),c72) ),
not_p60_107 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,c77),c78)),c72),
p59_44 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p60(X1,X2)
| ~ p60(X3,X2)
| ~ p24(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p24(f25(X1,X2),f25(X3,X4))
| ~ p22(X1,X3)
| ~ p23(X2,X4) ),
p24_94 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p60(f25(c75,X1),f21(c76,c78))
| ~ p59(f29(c73,f31(f33(c74,X1),X2)),c72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p60(f25(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ p60(f25(X4,X5),X3)
| ~ p22(X4,X1)
| ~ p23(X5,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p60(f25(c75,c79),f21(c76,c78)),
p60_42 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p60(f25(c75,c77),f21(c76,c78)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p60(f25(X1,X2),f21(c76,c78))
| ~ p22(c75,X1)
| ~ p23(c79,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p22(X1,X1),
p22_28 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p23(c79,c77),
p23_36 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.15 % Problem : SYN717-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.16 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.38 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.38 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.38 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.38 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:43:39 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.53 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lWh2dppAy7/E---3.1_25864.p
% 0.37/0.56 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # new_bool_1 with pid 25944 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.56 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # partial match(1): FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25947 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.56 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # partial match(1): FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.56 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.37/0.56 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.56 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.37/0.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.56 # Parsed axioms : 113
% 0.37/0.56 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Initial clauses : 113
% 0.37/0.56 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Initial clauses in saturation : 113
% 0.37/0.56 # Processed clauses : 375
% 0.37/0.56 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # ...subsumed : 42
% 0.37/0.56 # ...remaining for further processing : 333
% 0.37/0.56 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Generated clauses : 346
% 0.37/0.56 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 272
% 0.37/0.56 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Paramodulations : 346
% 0.37/0.56 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Total rewrite steps : 90
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of processed clauses : 220
% 0.37/0.56 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.37/0.56 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.37/0.56 # Non-unit-clauses : 169
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 122
% 0.37/0.56 # ...number of literals in the above : 465
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Current number of archived clauses : 113
% 0.37/0.56 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15598
% 0.37/0.56 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13449
% 0.37/0.56 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 42
% 0.37/0.56 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.37/0.56 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.37/0.56 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.56 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8485
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.56 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.37/0.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 2020 pages
% 0.37/0.56
% 0.37/0.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.56 # User time : 0.023 s
% 0.37/0.56 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Total time : 0.031 s
% 0.37/0.56 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.37/0.56 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------