TSTP Solution File: SYN716-1 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : SYN716-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 12:12:01 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 28 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 12 ~; 11 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 37 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f276,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f273,f34]) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
~ p62(c67,c72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p62_34) ).
fof(f273,plain,
p62(c67,c72),
inference(resolution,[],[f268,f99]) ).
fof(f99,axiom,
! [X224,X222,X223,X220,X221,X219] :
( ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X219),X221),X222),X223),X224),X220)
| p62(X219,X220) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_99) ).
fof(f268,plain,
p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71),c72),
inference(resolution,[],[f261,f97]) ).
fof(f97,axiom,
! [X215,X218,X216,X217] :
( ~ p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c66,X215),X217),X218)),X216)
| p62(X215,X216) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_97) ).
fof(f261,plain,
p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,c67),c68),c69),c70),c71))),c72),
inference(resolution,[],[f235,f229]) ).
fof(f229,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ p4(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71)),X0)
| p62(X0,c72) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f228,f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X19] : p32(X19,X19),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p32_20) ).
fof(f228,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ p32(c72,X1)
| ~ p4(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71)),X0)
| p62(X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f100,f68]) ).
fof(f68,axiom,
! [X101,X99,X102,X100] :
( ~ p62(X101,X102)
| ~ p4(X101,X99)
| ~ p32(X102,X100)
| p62(X99,X100) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_68) ).
fof(f100,axiom,
p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,c67),c68),c69)),c70),c71)),c72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p62_100) ).
fof(f235,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] : p4(f5(X0,f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5)),f5(X0,f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)))),
inference(resolution,[],[f106,f205]) ).
fof(f205,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ p3(X0,X1)
| p4(f5(X2,X0),f5(X2,X1)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f86,f28]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
! [X27] : p2(X27,X27),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_28) ).
fof(f86,axiom,
! [X171,X174,X172,X173] :
( ~ p2(X171,X173)
| ~ p3(X172,X174)
| p4(f5(X171,X172),f5(X173,X174)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_86) ).
fof(f106,axiom,
! [X224,X222,X223,X221,X219] : p3(f8(f11(f13(c65,f16(f19(f21(c66,X219),X221),X222)),X223),X224),f16(f19(f21(c66,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X219),X221),X222),X223),X224)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X219),X221),X222),X223),X224)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X219),X221),X222),X223),X224))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_106) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : SYN716-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Fri May 3 17:20:53 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.36 % (18376)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.21/0.38 % (18382)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18377)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18378)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18381)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18380)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18383)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.38 % (18379)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-18376"
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.39
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Memory used [KB]: 953
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.39 % (18381)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.21/0.39 % (18376)Success in time 0.027 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------