TSTP Solution File: SYN713-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN713-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.95s 2.12s
% Output   : Refutation 1.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN713-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 23:14:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37  Mon Jul 11 23:14:55 2022
% 0.13/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22636.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.13/0.37  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.37  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37  102 back subsumes 68.
% 0.13/0.37  103 back subsumes 69.
% 0.13/0.37  104 back subsumes 70.
% 0.13/0.37  105 back subsumes 71.
% 0.13/0.37  106 back subsumes 72.
% 0.13/0.37  107 back subsumes 73.
% 0.13/0.37  108 back subsumes 74.
% 0.13/0.37  109 back subsumes 75.
% 0.13/0.37  110 back subsumes 76.
% 0.13/0.37  111 back subsumes 77.
% 0.13/0.37  112 back subsumes 78.
% 0.13/0.37  113 back subsumes 79.
% 0.13/0.37  114 back subsumes 80.
% 0.13/0.37  115 back subsumes 81.
% 0.13/0.37  116 back subsumes 82.
% 0.13/0.37  117 back subsumes 83.
% 0.13/0.37  118 back subsumes 84.
% 0.13/0.37  119 back subsumes 85.
% 0.13/0.37  120 back subsumes 86.
% 0.13/0.37  121 back subsumes 87.
% 0.13/0.37  122 back subsumes 88.
% 0.13/0.37  123 back subsumes 89.
% 0.13/0.37  124 back subsumes 90.
% 0.13/0.37  125 back subsumes 91.
% 0.13/0.37  126 back subsumes 92.
% 0.13/0.37  127 back subsumes 93.
% 0.13/0.37  128 back subsumes 94.
% 0.13/0.37  129 back subsumes 95.
% 0.13/0.37  130 back subsumes 96.
% 0.13/0.37  131 back subsumes 97.
% 0.13/0.37  132 back subsumes 98.
% 0.13/0.37  133 back subsumes 99.
% 0.13/0.37  134 back subsumes 100.
% 0.13/0.37  135 back subsumes 101.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.95/2.12  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.95/2.12  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.95/2.12  number of clauses in intial UL: 67
% 1.95/2.12  number of clauses initially in problem: 105
% 1.95/2.12  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 1.95/2.12  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 66
% 1.95/2.12  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 1.95/2.12  absolute distinct symbol count: 116
% 1.95/2.12     distinct predicate count: 45
% 1.95/2.12     distinct function count: 41
% 1.95/2.12     distinct constant count: 30
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.74 sec ----> 207 [binary,206.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  1 [] {+} -p57(f26(f28(c71,f41(c78,c64)),c67),c77).
% 1.95/2.12  36 [] {+} p57(f26(f28(c71,A),B),C)| -p57(f26(A,B),C).
% 1.95/2.12  38 [] {+} p56(A,B)| -p40(C,B)| -p56(D,C)| -p4(D,A).
% 1.95/2.12  42 [] {+} -p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,c77)),f19(f22(c70,c69),c68)).
% 1.95/2.12  43 [] {+} p10(f14(A,B),f14(C,D))| -p12(A,C)| -p13(B,D).
% 1.95/2.12  49 [] {+} p4(f11(A,B),f11(C,D))| -p10(B,D)| -p9(A,C).
% 1.95/2.12  63 [] {+} p57(f26(f41(c78,A),B),C)| -p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,B),f23(c74,C))),A).
% 1.95/2.12  67 [] {+} p13(A,f23(c74,B))|p58(f31(f33(c75,c76),f23(c69,B)),f19(f22(c70,c69),A))| -p59(f38(c72,B),f35(c73,A)).
% 1.95/2.12  103 [] {-} p9(A,A).
% 1.95/2.12  115 [] {-} p40(A,A).
% 1.95/2.12  135 [] {-} p12(A,A).
% 1.95/2.12  136 [] {-} p59(f38(c72,c77),f35(c73,c68)).
% 1.95/2.12  139 [] {-} p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),c68)),c64).
% 1.95/2.12  140 [hyper,136,67,unit_del,42] {-} p13(c68,f23(c74,c77)).
% 1.95/2.12  145 [hyper,140,43,135] {-} p10(f14(A,c68),f14(A,f23(c74,c77))).
% 1.95/2.12  165 [hyper,145,49,103] {-} p4(f11(A,f14(B,c68)),f11(A,f14(B,f23(c74,c77)))).
% 1.95/2.12  204 [hyper,165,38,115,139] {-} p56(f11(c65,f14(f17(c66,c67),f23(c74,c77))),c64).
% 1.95/2.12  205 [hyper,204,63] {-} p57(f26(f41(c78,c64),c67),c77).
% 1.95/2.12  206 [hyper,205,36] {-} p57(f26(f28(c71,f41(c78,c64)),c67),c77).
% 1.95/2.12  207 [binary,206.1,1.1] {-} $F.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.95/2.12  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  ============ end of search ============
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.95/2.12  
% 1.95/2.12  Process 22636 finished Mon Jul 11 23:14:56 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------