TSTP Solution File: SYN712-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN712-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:33:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 51 ( 0 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 34 ( 34 usr; 12 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 69 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p62_69,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p62(X3,X4)
| ~ p32(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p62_69) ).
cnf(p32_20,negated_conjecture,
p32(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p32_20) ).
cnf(p4_82,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p3(X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p4_82) ).
cnf(p62_100,negated_conjecture,
p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72)),c69),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p62_100) ).
cnf(p3_104,negated_conjecture,
p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p3_104) ).
cnf(p62_97,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X3),X4)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p62_97) ).
cnf(p2_28,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p2_28) ).
cnf(not_p62_67,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c69),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',not_p62_67) ).
cnf(p62_98,negated_conjecture,
( p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4)
| ~ p62(X1,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p62_98) ).
cnf(p62_99,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p',p62_99) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1)
| ~ p62(X3,X4)
| ~ p32(X4,X2) ),
p62_69 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p32(X1,X1),
p32_20 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p62(X3,X2)
| ~ p4(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(X1,X2),f5(X3,X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p3(X2,X4) ),
p4_82 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p62(f5(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ p62(f5(X4,X5),X3)
| ~ p2(X4,X1)
| ~ p3(X5,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p62(f5(c64,f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72)),c69),
p62_100 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p62(f5(X1,X2),c69)
| ~ p2(c64,X1)
| ~ p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c71),c72),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
p3(f16(f19(f21(c70,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4),X5),f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,X1),X2),X3),X4),X5))),
p3_104 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X3),X4)),X2) ),
p62_97 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( p62(f5(X1,f8(f11(f13(c65,f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72)),f43(f45(f47(f49(f51(c75,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72)),f53(f55(f57(f59(f61(c76,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72))),c69)
| ~ p2(c64,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_28 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,c66),c67),c68)),c69),
not_p62_67 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( p62(f5(c64,f8(f11(f13(c65,X1),X2),X3)),X4)
| ~ p62(X1,X4) ),
p62_98 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( p62(X1,X2)
| ~ p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,X1),X3),X4),X5),X6),X2) ),
p62_99 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
p62(f23(f25(f27(f29(f31(c74,c66),c67),c68),c71),c72),c69),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ p62(c66,c69),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.12 % Problem : SYN712-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:41:46 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.RI81N8UJvb/E---3.1_24899.p
% 0.21/0.53 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 25002 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 25008 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.53 # Search class: FHHNM-FFMF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.53 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53 # Parsed axioms : 104
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses : 104
% 0.21/0.53 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Initial clauses in saturation : 104
% 0.21/0.53 # Processed clauses : 279
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.21/0.53 # ...remaining for further processing : 278
% 0.21/0.53 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Generated clauses : 205
% 0.21/0.53 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 168
% 0.21/0.53 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Paramodulations : 205
% 0.21/0.53 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Total rewrite steps : 34
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of processed clauses : 174
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.21/0.53 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit-clauses : 136
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 96
% 0.21/0.53 # ...number of literals in the above : 350
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Current number of archived clauses : 104
% 0.21/0.53 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7973
% 0.21/0.53 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7154
% 0.21/0.53 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.21/0.53 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.21/0.53 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.53 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6544
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.016 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1852 pages
% 0.21/0.53
% 0.21/0.53 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53 # User time : 0.091 s
% 0.21/0.53 # System time : 0.028 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Total time : 0.119 s
% 0.21/0.53 # Maximum resident set size: 1796 pages
% 0.21/0.53 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------