%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SYN711-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:23:50 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : SYN711-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 22:27:28 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/0.87  
% 0.71/0.87  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.71/0.87  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.71/0.87  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/0.87  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.71/0.87  SPASS derived 1975 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1301 clauses.
% 0.71/0.87  SPASS allocated 78253 KBytes.
% 0.71/0.87  SPASS spent	0:00:00.51 on the problem.
% 0.71/0.87  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.71/0.87  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.71/0.87  		0:00:00.02 for inferences.
% 0.71/0.87  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.71/0.87  		0:00:00.40 for the reduction.
% 0.71/0.87  
% 0.71/0.87  
% 0.71/0.87  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 8 :
% 0.71/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/0.87  25[0:Inp] ||  -> p42(f16(c62),f16(f7(c46)))*r.
% 0.71/0.87  26[0:Inp] || p41(u,v)* -> p42(u,v).
% 0.71/0.87  47[0:Inp] || p42(u,v)* p42(v,w)* -> p42(u,w)*.
% 0.71/0.87  78[0:Inp] || p42(f16(c62),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49)))))))))))*r -> .
% 0.71/0.87  80[0:Inp] ||  -> p41(f16(f7(c46)),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49)))))))))))*.
% 0.71/0.87  445[0:Res:80.0,26.0] ||  -> p42(f16(f7(c46)),f13(f14(f10(f11(f15(f12(c49)))),f11(f15(f15(f15(f15(f12(f15(f12(c49)))))))))))*r.
% 0.71/0.87  2075[0:NCh:47.2,47.1,445.0,78.0] || p42(f16(c62),f16(f7(c46)))*r -> .
% 0.71/0.87  2077[0:MRR:2075.0,25.0] ||  -> .
% 0.71/0.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/0.87  Formulae used in the proof : p42_25 p42_26 p42_47 not_p42_78 p41_80
% 0.71/0.87  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------