TSTP Solution File: SYN711-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN711-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 11:30:33 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.41s
% Output : Refutation 4.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10199/SYN/SYN711-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46531] [nf = 0] [nu = 46350] [ut = 30857]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: p17_2(x0,x0)
% B27: ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))))))))))
% B31: p41_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))))))))))
% B44: ~p41_2(x0,x1) | p42_2(x0,x1)
% B75: ~p42_2(x2,x1) | ~p42_2(x0,x2) | p42_2(x0,x1)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U23: < d0 v0 dv0 f3 c2 t5 td3 b nc > p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())))
% U64: < d1 v0 dv0 f16 c3 t19 td11 > p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))))))))))
% U30857: < d2 v0 dv0 f3 c2 t5 td3 > ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())))
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U23:
% p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U23
% Derivation of unit clause U64:
% p41_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... B31
% ~p41_2(x0,x1) | p42_2(x0,x1) ....... B44
% p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())), f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))), f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... R1 [B31:L0, B44:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U30857:
% ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... B27
% ~p42_2(x2,x1) | ~p42_2(x0,x2) | p42_2(x0,x1) ....... B75
% ~p42_2(x0, f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))), f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) | ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()), x0) ....... R1 [B27:L0, B75:L2]
% p42_2(f16_1(f7_1(c46_0())),f13_1(f14_2(f10_1(f11_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0())))),f11_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f15_1(f12_1(f15_1(f12_1(c49_0()))))))))))) ....... U64
% ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()), f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U64:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% ~p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U30857
% p42_2(f16_1(c62_0()),f16_1(f7_1(c46_0()))) ....... U23
% [] ....... R1 [U30857:L0, U23:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 878981
% resolvents: 878981 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 878350
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.93
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 42 [1] = 30815 [2] = 1
% Total = 30858
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 878350 [2] = 600 [3] = 31
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p39_1 (+)3 (-)0
% [1] p45_1 (+)0 (-)3
% [2] p17_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] p19_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] p22_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [5] p24_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] p26_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [7] p28_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [8] p2_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] p33_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [10] p3_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [11] p40_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [12] p41_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [13] p42_2 (+)6 (-)2
% [14] p43_2 (+)2 (-)0
% [15] p44_2 (+)4 (-)0
% [16] p5_2 (+)7 (-)0
% [17] p6_2 (+)30811 (-)0
% [18] p9_2 (+)4 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)30852 (-)6
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 30858
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2137
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 878984
% Number of unification failures: 123320
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 8
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1039
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3346
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 4
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 847512
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 1
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 41
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 19
% Number of states in UCFA table: 527996
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 914231
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 1.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.58
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 96
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 1002304
% ConstructUnitClause() = 878328
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 2.09 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 219745
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 5 secs
% CPU time: 4.40 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------