TSTP Solution File: SYN703-1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SYN703-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:02:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 29 ( 29 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 20 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p15_5,negated_conjecture,
p15(X,X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p15_5) ).
cnf(p2_8,negated_conjecture,
p2(X,X),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_8) ).
cnf(not_p47_51,negated_conjecture,
~ p47(f5(c48,f8(f11(f13(c49,c50),c51),c52)),c53),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p47_51) ).
cnf(p47_53,negated_conjecture,
( p47(X,Y)
| ~ p4(Z,X)
| ~ p47(Z,U)
| ~ p15(U,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_53) ).
cnf(p4_60,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(X,Y),f5(Z,U))
| ~ p2(X,Z)
| ~ p3(Y,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_60) ).
cnf(p47_74,negated_conjecture,
( p47(X,Y)
| ~ p47(f5(c48,f8(f11(f13(c49,X),Z),U)),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_74) ).
cnf(p47_75,negated_conjecture,
( p47(X,Y)
| ~ p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c56,X),Z),U),V),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_75) ).
cnf(p47_76,negated_conjecture,
( p47(f5(c48,f8(f11(f13(c49,X),Y),Z)),U)
| ~ p47(X,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_76) ).
cnf(p47_77,negated_conjecture,
p47(f5(c48,f16(f18(c54,f8(f11(f13(c49,c50),c51),c52)),c55)),c53),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p47_77) ).
cnf(p3_80,negated_conjecture,
p3(f16(f18(c54,f8(f11(f13(c49,X),Y),Z)),U),f8(f11(f13(c49,f20(f22(f24(f26(c56,X),Y),Z),U)),f30(f32(f34(f36(c57,X),Y),Z),U)),f40(f42(f44(f46(c58,X),Y),Z),U))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_80) ).
cnf(85,plain,
~ p47(c50,c53),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p47_76,not_p47_51]) ).
cnf(92,plain,
~ p47(f20(f22(f24(f26(c56,c50),X),Y),Z),c53),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p47_75,85]) ).
cnf(96,plain,
~ p47(f5(c48,f8(f11(f13(c49,f20(f22(f24(f26(c56,c50),X),Y),Z)),U),V)),c53),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p47_74,92]) ).
cnf(114,plain,
~ p4(f5(c48,f16(f18(c54,f8(f11(f13(c49,c50),c51),c52)),c55)),f5(c48,f8(f11(f13(c49,f20(f22(f24(f26(c56,c50),X),Y),Z)),U),V))),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p47_53,96,p47_77,p15_5]) ).
cnf(178,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[p4_60,114,p2_8,p3_80]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SYN703-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 11:31:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 *
% 0.19/0.45 *
% 0.19/0.45 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.45 *
% 0.19/0.45 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.45 *
% 0.19/0.46 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 "."
% 0.19/0.46 *
% 0.19/0.46 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T11:31:57
% 0.19/0.46 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n011.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T11:31:57
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 #||
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.54 ||#
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.19/0.54 ; 354 formulas have been input or derived (from 123 formulas).
% 0.19/0.54 ; 178 (50%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.19/0.54 ; 4 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.19/0.54 ; 174 (98%) are still being kept.
% 0.19/0.54 ;
% 0.19/0.54 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.014 18% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.003 4% Assert (80 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.021 26% Process new row (297 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.008 10% Resolution (244 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.003 4% Paramodulation (122 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (51 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Forward subsumption (51 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Backward subsumption (51 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.002 2% Forward simplification (297 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.006 8% Backward simplification (178 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.023 29% Other
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.080 Total
% 0.19/0.54 ; 0.082 Real time
% 0.19/0.54 ;
% 0.19/0.54 ; Term-hash-array has 608 terms in all.
% 0.19/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 51 entries (51 at peak, 51 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 179 nodes (179 at peak, 179 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Retrieved 20 possibly forward subsuming rows in 51 calls.
% 0.19/0.54 ; Retrieved 20 possibly backward subsumed rows in 51 calls.
% 0.19/0.54 ; Path-index has 606 entries (606 at peak, 619 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Path-index has 3,541 nodes (3,541 at peak, 3,567 added, 26 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Trie-index has 606 entries (606 at peak, 619 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Trie-index has 3,661 nodes (3,661 at peak, 3,706 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.19/0.54 ; Retrieved 373 generalization terms in 368 calls.
% 0.19/0.54 ; Retrieved 130 instance terms in 126 calls.
% 0.19/0.54 ; Retrieved 1,980 unifiable terms in 1,458 calls.
% 0.19/0.54 ;
% 0.19/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to process has 4 entries:
% 0.19/0.54 ; 1 with value 9 1 with value 40 2 with value 45
% 0.19/0.54 ; The agenda of rows to give has 52 entries:
% 0.19/0.54 ; 7 with value (4 44) 3 with value (4 52) 14 with value (4 57)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 3 with value (4 45) 4 with value (4 54) 4 with value (4 63)
% 0.19/0.54 ; 1 with value (4 48) 12 with value (4 55) 4 with value (4 65)
% 0.19/0.54 Evaluation took:
% 0.19/0.54 0.083 seconds of real time
% 0.19/0.54 0.076054 seconds of user run time
% 0.19/0.54 0.0061 seconds of system run time
% 0.19/0.54 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.19/0.54 0 page faults and
% 0.19/0.54 6,448,808 bytes consed.
% 0.19/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.54 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T11:31:57
% 0.19/0.54 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.19/0.54 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------