TSTP Solution File: SYN699-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN699-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:15:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 10.47s 10.71s
% Output   : Refutation 10.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SYN699-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 14:42:18 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Mon Jul 11 14:42:18 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8485.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.20/0.36  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.20/0.36  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36  67 back subsumes 46.
% 0.20/0.36  68 back subsumes 47.
% 0.20/0.36  69 back subsumes 48.
% 0.20/0.36  70 back subsumes 49.
% 0.20/0.36  71 back subsumes 50.
% 0.20/0.36  72 back subsumes 60.
% 0.20/0.36  72 back subsumes 51.
% 0.20/0.36  73 back subsumes 52.
% 0.20/0.36  74 back subsumes 53.
% 0.20/0.36  75 back subsumes 54.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.42/0.59  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.42/0.59  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.42/0.59  number of clauses in intial UL: 50
% 0.42/0.59  number of clauses initially in problem: 79
% 0.42/0.59  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 0.42/0.59  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.42/0.59  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.42/0.59  absolute distinct symbol count: 47
% 0.42/0.59     distinct predicate count: 18
% 0.42/0.59     distinct function count: 14
% 0.42/0.59     distinct constant count: 15
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  
% 0.42/0.59  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  Changing weight limit from 60 to 21.
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.49/0.66  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 95 givens.
% 0.49/0.66  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Changing weight limit from 21 to 19.
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.55/0.73  Resetting weight limit to 19 after 100 givens.
% 0.55/0.73  
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  Changing weight limit from 19 to 15.
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.60/0.77  Resetting weight limit to 15 after 105 givens.
% 0.60/0.77  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Changing weight limit from 15 to 14.
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Resetting weight limit to 14 after 275 givens.
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Changing weight limit from 14 to 13.
% 0.92/1.14  
% 0.92/1.14  Resetting weight limit to 13 after 280 givens.
% 0.92/1.14  
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 10.47/10.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 10.47/10.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   8.73 sec ----> 24794 [binary,24793.1,28.1] {-} $F.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 10.47/10.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 10.47/10.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  7 [] {+} p3(f4(A),f4(B))| -p2(A,B).
% 10.47/10.71  18 [] {+} p2(A,B)| -p2(C,A)| -p2(C,B).
% 10.47/10.71  28 [] {+} -p2(f11(f4(c46),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)).
% 10.47/10.71  34 [] {+} p2(f11(A,B),f11(C,D))| -p10(B,D)| -p3(A,C).
% 10.47/10.71  67 [] {-} p10(A,A).
% 10.47/10.71  72 [] {-} p2(A,A).
% 10.47/10.71  78 [] {-} p2(c44,c46).
% 10.47/10.71  88 [] {-} p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)).
% 10.47/10.71  107 [hyper,78,7] {-} p3(f4(c44),f4(c46)).
% 10.47/10.71  249 [hyper,107,34,67] {-} p2(f11(f4(c44),A),f11(f4(c46),A)).
% 10.47/10.71  1181 [hyper,88,18,72] {-} p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)).
% 10.47/10.71  24793 [hyper,1181,18,249] {-} p2(f11(f4(c46),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)).
% 10.47/10.71  24794 [binary,24793.1,28.1] {-} $F.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 10.47/10.71  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  ============ end of search ============
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 10.47/10.71  
% 10.47/10.71  Process 8485 finished Mon Jul 11 14:42:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------