TSTP Solution File: SYN699-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : SYN699-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:18:11 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.39s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p2_42,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p2_42) ).
cnf(p2_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p2_12) ).
cnf(p2_55,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p2_55) ).
cnf(not_p2_56,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c46),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',not_p2_56) ).
cnf(p2_62,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4))
| ~ p10(X2,X4)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p2_62) ).
cnf(p3_31,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))
| ~ p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p3_31) ).
cnf(p2_18,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c46),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p2_18) ).
cnf(p10_7,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p',p10_7) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X3,X1)
| ~ p2(X3,X2) ),
p2_42 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
p2(X1,X1),
p2_12 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,X2)
| ~ p2(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)),
p2_55 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c46),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
not_p2_56 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p2(X1,f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43))
| ~ p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(X1,X2),f11(X3,X4))
| ~ p10(X2,X4)
| ~ p3(X1,X3) ),
p2_62 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( p3(f4(X1),f4(X2))
| ~ p2(X1,X2) ),
p3_31 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c44),c43),f11(f4(c46),c43)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( p2(f11(f4(X1),X2),f11(f4(X3),X4))
| ~ p2(X1,X3)
| ~ p10(X2,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c46),
p2_18 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
p10(X1,X1),
p10_7 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07 % Problem : SYN699-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.02/0.08 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.26 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.26 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.08/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.26 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:41:06 EDT 2023
% 0.08/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.34 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.34 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.bxB2JdftaX/E---3.1_1896.p
% 0.11/0.39 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # new_bool_3 with pid 1975 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.39 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 1980 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.39 # Search class: FGHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.39 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.39 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.39 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # Proof found!
% 0.11/0.39 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.39 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.39 # Parsed axioms : 74
% 0.11/0.39 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Initial clauses : 74
% 0.11/0.39 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.11/0.39 # Processed clauses : 833
% 0.11/0.39 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # ...subsumed : 246
% 0.11/0.39 # ...remaining for further processing : 587
% 0.11/0.39 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.11/0.39 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Generated clauses : 2693
% 0.11/0.39 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2589
% 0.11/0.39 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.11/0.39 # Paramodulations : 2693
% 0.11/0.39 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Total rewrite steps : 227
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of processed clauses : 508
% 0.11/0.39 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.11/0.39 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.39 # Non-unit-clauses : 465
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1904
% 0.11/0.39 # ...number of literals in the above : 6027
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Current number of archived clauses : 79
% 0.11/0.39 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42388
% 0.11/0.39 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36001
% 0.11/0.39 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 245
% 0.11/0.39 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 142
% 0.11/0.39 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.11/0.39 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.39 # Termbank termtop insertions : 41858
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39 # User time : 0.046 s
% 0.11/0.39 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1964 pages
% 0.11/0.39
% 0.11/0.39 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.39 # User time : 0.046 s
% 0.11/0.39 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Total time : 0.051 s
% 0.11/0.39 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages
% 0.11/0.39 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.11/0.40 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------