TSTP Solution File: SYN695-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SYN695-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:40:27 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.85s 1.99s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_55,negated_conjecture,
p10(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p10_7) ).
cnf(c_60,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_12) ).
cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c45),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_18) ).
cnf(c_78,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| p3(f4(X0),f4(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p3_30) ).
cnf(c_89,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_41) ).
cnf(c_102,negated_conjecture,
p2(f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43),f11(f4(c44),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_54) ).
cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(f11(f4(c45),c43),f11(f4(f23(c44,f9(f20(c37)))),c43)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p2_55) ).
cnf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X0,X1)
| ~ p3(X2,X3)
| p2(f11(X2,X0),f11(X3,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p2_61) ).
cnf(c_595,plain,
f4(c44) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_596,plain,
f11(sP1_iProver_def,c43) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_609,plain,
f4(c45) = sP15_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_610,plain,
f11(sP15_iProver_def,c43) = sP16_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_611,plain,
f23(c44,sP8_iProver_def) = sP17_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_612,plain,
f4(sP17_iProver_def) = sP18_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_613,plain,
f11(sP18_iProver_def,c43) = sP19_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_623,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p10(X0,X1)
| ~ p3(X2,X3)
| p2(f11(X2,X0),f11(X3,X1)) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_109]) ).
cnf(c_628,negated_conjecture,
~ p2(sP16_iProver_def,sP19_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_103,c_611,c_612,c_613,c_609,c_610]) ).
cnf(c_629,negated_conjecture,
p2(sP19_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_102]) ).
cnf(c_636,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| ~ p2(X0,X2)
| p2(X1,X2) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).
cnf(c_643,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p2(X0,X1)
| p3(f4(X0),f4(X1)) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_78]) ).
cnf(c_647,negated_conjecture,
p2(c44,c45),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_66]) ).
cnf(c_650,negated_conjecture,
p2(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).
cnf(c_652,negated_conjecture,
p10(X0,X0),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_55]) ).
cnf(c_1290,plain,
( ~ p2(c44,X0)
| p3(sP1_iProver_def,f4(X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_595,c_643]) ).
cnf(c_2014,plain,
( ~ p2(c44,c45)
| p3(sP1_iProver_def,sP15_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_609,c_1290]) ).
cnf(c_2028,plain,
p3(sP1_iProver_def,sP15_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2014,c_647]) ).
cnf(c_27453,plain,
( ~ p2(sP19_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(sP2_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_629,c_636]) ).
cnf(c_27585,plain,
( ~ p10(c43,X0)
| ~ p3(sP1_iProver_def,X1)
| p2(sP2_iProver_def,f11(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_596,c_623]) ).
cnf(c_27880,plain,
p2(sP2_iProver_def,sP19_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_650,c_27453]) ).
cnf(c_27995,plain,
( ~ p10(c43,c43)
| ~ p3(sP1_iProver_def,sP15_iProver_def)
| p2(sP2_iProver_def,sP16_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_610,c_27585]) ).
cnf(c_28003,plain,
( ~ p3(sP1_iProver_def,sP15_iProver_def)
| p2(sP2_iProver_def,sP16_iProver_def) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_27995,c_652]) ).
cnf(c_28343,plain,
p2(sP2_iProver_def,sP16_iProver_def),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_28003,c_2028,c_28003]) ).
cnf(c_28346,plain,
( ~ p2(sP2_iProver_def,X0)
| p2(sP16_iProver_def,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_28343,c_636]) ).
cnf(c_29160,plain,
p2(sP16_iProver_def,sP19_iProver_def),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_27880,c_28346]) ).
cnf(c_29162,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_29160,c_628]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07 % Problem : SYN695-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.02/0.07 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.07/0.26 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26 % DateTime : Sun Jun 23 22:44:09 EDT 2024
% 0.07/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 9.85/1.99 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 9.85/1.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ iProver source info
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 git: date: 2024-06-12 09:56:46 +0000
% 9.85/1.99 git: sha1: 4869ab62f0a3398f9d3a35e6db7918ebd3847e49
% 9.85/1.99 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Parsing...successful
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 39 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Proving...
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Problem Properties
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 clauses 59
% 9.85/1.99 conjectures 34
% 9.85/1.99 EPR 20
% 9.85/1.99 Horn 59
% 9.85/1.99 unary 41
% 9.85/1.99 binary 6
% 9.85/1.99 lits 90
% 9.85/1.99 lits eq 25
% 9.85/1.99 fd_pure 0
% 9.85/1.99 fd_pseudo 0
% 9.85/1.99 fd_cond 0
% 9.85/1.99 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 9.85/1.99 AC symbols 0
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------
% 9.85/1.99 Current options:
% 9.85/1.99 ------
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 ------ Proving...
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.85/1.99
% 9.85/1.99
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------