TSTP Solution File: SYN687-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN687-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:47:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.96s 0.87s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 7 unt; 8 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 45 ( 0 equ; 18 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 8 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(p4_57,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f26(f28(c47,X1),X2),X3))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X4),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X4))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p35(f12(X1,X3),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_57) ).
cnf(p4_56,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,X1),X2),f5(f9(c39,X3),X2))
| ~ p4(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2)),f5(X3,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_56) ).
cnf(p4_55,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,X1),X2),f5(f9(c39,X3),X2))
| p35(f12(c37,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2)),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_55) ).
cnf(p34_19,negated_conjecture,
p34(c36,c37),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p34_19) ).
cnf(p4_58,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X3))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p4(f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c47,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p4_58) ).
cnf(not_p4_40,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f5(X1,f7(c38,X1)),f5(f9(c39,X1),f7(c38,X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_p4_40) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f26(f28(c47,X1),X2),X3))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X4),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X4))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p35(f12(X1,X3),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,X1),X2),f5(f9(c39,X3),X2))
| ~ p4(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2)),f5(X3,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_56]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f26(f28(c47,X1),X2),X3))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X4),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X4))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p35(f12(X1,X3),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,X1),X2),f5(f9(c39,X3),X2))
| p35(f12(c37,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2)),X2) ),
p4_55 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
p34(c36,c37),
p34_19 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X3))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p4(f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c47,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p4_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,X1),X2),f5(f9(c39,X3),X2))
| ~ p4(f5(X1,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2)),f5(X3,f14(f16(f18(c40,X1),X3),X2))) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),X1),f14(f16(f18(c40,X2),X3),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1))),f5(f26(f28(c47,c37),X1),f14(f16(f18(c40,X2),X3),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1))))
| p4(f5(f9(c39,X2),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1)),f5(f9(c39,X3),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1)))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),X1),X4),f5(f9(X1,f26(f28(c46,c37),X1)),X4)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,X1),X2),X3),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),X3))
| ~ p34(c36,X1)
| ~ p4(f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c46,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2)),f5(f9(X2,f26(f28(c47,X1),X2)),f30(f32(c45,X1),X2))) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f9(c39,f26(f28(c46,c37),X1)),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1)),f5(f9(c39,f26(f28(c47,c37),X1)),f30(f32(c45,c37),X1)))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),X1),X2),f5(f9(X1,f26(f28(c46,c37),X1)),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f5(X1,f7(c38,X1)),f5(f9(c39,X1),f7(c38,X1))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_p4_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),c39),X1),f5(f9(c39,f26(f28(c46,c37),c39)),X1))
| p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),c39),X2),f5(f9(c39,f26(f28(c46,c37),c39)),X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p4(f5(X1,f7(c38,X1)),f5(f9(c39,X1),f7(c38,X1))),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p4(f5(f26(f28(c46,c37),c39),X1),f5(f9(c39,f26(f28(c46,c37),c39)),X1)),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SYN687-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.37 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37 % DateTime : Mon May 20 14:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.96/0.87 # Version: 3.1.0
% 2.96/0.87 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.96/0.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8306 completed with status 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.96/0.87 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.96/0.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.96/0.87 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 2.96/0.87 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 8311 completed with status 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.96/0.87 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.96/0.87 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # No SInE strategy applied
% 2.96/0.87 # Search class: FGUNM-FFMF22-MFFFFFNN
% 2.96/0.87 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.96/0.87 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 2.96/0.87 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.96/0.87
% 2.96/0.87 # Proof found!
% 2.96/0.87 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.96/0.87 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.96/0.87 # Parsed axioms : 60
% 2.96/0.87 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Initial clauses : 60
% 2.96/0.87 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Initial clauses in saturation : 60
% 2.96/0.87 # Processed clauses : 1610
% 2.96/0.87 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # ...subsumed : 555
% 2.96/0.87 # ...remaining for further processing : 1055
% 2.96/0.87 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Backward-subsumed : 19
% 2.96/0.87 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Generated clauses : 3762
% 2.96/0.87 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3709
% 2.96/0.87 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Paramodulations : 3760
% 2.96/0.87 # Factorizations : 2
% 2.96/0.87 # NegExts : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Total rewrite steps : 335
% 2.96/0.87 # ...of those cached : 294
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional check models : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 2.96/0.87 # Current number of processed clauses : 976
% 2.96/0.87 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 2.96/0.87 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 2.96/0.87 # Non-unit-clauses : 953
% 2.96/0.87 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2155
% 2.96/0.87 # ...number of literals in the above : 12701
% 2.96/0.87 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Current number of archived clauses : 79
% 2.96/0.87 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 796468
% 2.96/0.87 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 184743
% 2.96/0.87 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 550
% 2.96/0.87 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 2.96/0.87 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 2.96/0.87 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 2.96/0.87 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Condensation successes : 0
% 2.96/0.87 # Termbank termtop insertions : 112359
% 2.96/0.87 # Search garbage collected termcells : 219
% 2.96/0.87
% 2.96/0.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.96/0.87 # User time : 0.337 s
% 2.96/0.87 # System time : 0.010 s
% 2.96/0.87 # Total time : 0.347 s
% 2.96/0.87 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 2.96/0.87
% 2.96/0.87 # -------------------------------------------------
% 2.96/0.87 # User time : 1.685 s
% 2.96/0.87 # System time : 0.027 s
% 2.96/0.87 # Total time : 1.711 s
% 2.96/0.87 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 2.96/0.87 % E---3.1 exiting
% 2.96/0.87 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------